Re: [reverse RFA] no singlestep-over-BP in reverse

Michael Snyder
2008-09-17T18:16:42Z

teawater wrote:
> Agree with you.
>
> And I think Maybe need add a test for it.
> I think is:
> 1. There is a statement that set the value of a variable.
> For example:
> a = 1;
> 2. Before this statement, the value of this variable is not same with new value.
> 3. Set a breakpoint on this statement, And check the value of this
> variable when forward execute and reverse execute program break by
> this breakpoint. If the value is the new value, fail. If is the old
> value, pass.

That's the idea behind this test.
Do you think this test does what you want?
If not, what would you add to it?