From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1948 invoked by alias); 15 Jun 2008 00:44:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 1938 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Jun 2008 00:44:22 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from ti-out-0910.google.com (HELO ti-out-0910.google.com) (209.85.142.191) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sun, 15 Jun 2008 00:44:05 +0000 Received: by ti-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id d10so1330521tib.12 for ; Sat, 14 Jun 2008 17:44:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.110.84.2 with SMTP id h2mr3122762tib.47.1213490642925; Sat, 14 Jun 2008 17:44:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.110.109.4 with HTTP; Sat, 14 Jun 2008 17:44:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 03:27:00 -0000 From: teawater To: "Michael Snyder" Subject: Re: GDB record patch 0.1.3.1 for GDB-6.8 release Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, "Thiago Jung Bauermann" , "Pedro Alves" In-Reply-To: <1213419578.3601.799.camel@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <200805231746.23570.pedro@codesourcery.com> <200806090152.00220.pedro@codesourcery.com> <1213204275.3601.605.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1213295393.3601.669.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1213419578.3601.799.camel@localhost.localdomain> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-06/txt/msg00273.txt.bz2 On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 12:59, Michael Snyder wrote: > On Sat, 2008-06-14 at 11:19 +0800, teawater wrote: >> Hi Michael, >> >> I am reading "msnyder-reverse-20080609-branch". >> I want to say that it's so great. It make all the reverse function >> very clear. I like it. :) >> >> And I want say thanks to Pedro. Your idea that make recrd to be a >> target is very fit "msnyder-reverse-20080609-branch". >> To make record work with "msnyder-reverse-20080609-branch" without >> your idea is so hard. :) >> >> I want to make record to be a target how do you think about it? > > I think it makes sense. > It's a good way to keep things isolated from each other. > > It should make it possible to say "look, this can't possibly > break anything else", which will hasten acceptance. > OK. :)