From: teawater <teawater@gmail.com>
To: "Michael Snyder" <msnyder@specifix.com>
Cc: "Pedro Alves" <pedro@codesourcery.com>,
gdb-patches@sourceware.org,
"Thiago Jung Bauermann" <bauerman@br.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: GDB record patch 0.1.3.1 for GDB-6.8 release
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 18:10:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <daef60380806112250m4d0fda2ybf4d80f069a81e10@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1213204275.3601.605.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Thanks Michael,
I've got it and read it. :)
Hui
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 01:11, Michael Snyder <msnyder@specifix.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 15:45 +0800, teawater wrote:
>> Hi Pedro,
>>
>> > Don't worry, it's really more about code reorganization, than
>> > rewriting. :-)
>> >
>> > You have two major components in your patch.
>> >
>> > 1 - The record/replay component
>> > 2 - The inferior control in reverse execution mode.
>> >
>> > I'm suggesting to split those up, and make them communicate
>> > with an abstracted interface (target methods). In addition,
>> > make the record support a layer on top of the
>> > forward-execution-only debugging targets (of course, defering
>> > much to the arch support).
>> >
>> Michael Snyder is think about it too. He make a rev interface in
>> before. I will try to use it.
>
> Hui,
>
> I've created a new branch in which I've hoisted my old
> reverse-debugging changes into the current codebase.
> It compiles, but I haven't had a chance to test it yet
> to see if it actually works in reverse.
>
> You might like to take a look at it, to get an idea of
> the direction we were most recently headed -- maybe diff
> it against the base to look at the changes.
>
> Branch name: msnyder-reverse-20080609-branch
>
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-12 5:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-23 8:55 Tea
2008-05-20 4:33 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2008-05-20 6:38 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-05-20 15:32 ` Tea
2008-05-20 18:51 ` Michael Snyder
2008-05-21 17:26 ` Tea
2008-05-20 15:33 ` Tea
2008-05-21 17:14 ` Tea
2008-05-21 22:01 ` Michael Snyder
2008-05-21 22:16 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2008-05-21 22:40 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-05-22 15:08 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2008-05-23 2:54 ` Tea
2008-05-23 4:33 ` Michael Snyder
2008-05-23 14:33 ` Tea
2008-05-23 16:46 ` Michael Snyder
2008-05-23 18:16 ` Tea
2008-05-23 3:52 ` Pedro Alves
2008-05-23 14:31 ` Tea
2008-05-23 21:10 ` Pedro Alves
2008-06-08 6:53 ` teawater
2008-06-09 0:52 ` Pedro Alves
2008-06-09 3:00 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-06-09 13:58 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2008-06-10 2:04 ` Michael Snyder
2008-06-09 22:56 ` Michael Snyder
2008-06-11 11:59 ` teawater
2008-06-11 20:03 ` Michael Snyder
2008-06-12 18:10 ` teawater [this message]
2008-06-13 6:08 ` Michael Snyder
2008-06-14 6:24 ` teawater
2008-06-14 10:31 ` Michael Snyder
2008-06-15 3:27 ` teawater
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=daef60380806112250m4d0fda2ybf4d80f069a81e10@mail.gmail.com \
--to=teawater@gmail.com \
--cc=bauerman@br.ibm.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=msnyder@specifix.com \
--cc=pedro@codesourcery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox