From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25541 invoked by alias); 24 Apr 2008 01:45:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 25531 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Apr 2008 01:45:06 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com (HELO wf-out-1314.google.com) (209.85.200.170) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Apr 2008 01:44:45 +0000 Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 29so2321868wff.24 for ; Wed, 23 Apr 2008 18:44:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.47.6 with SMTP id u6mr278516wfu.159.1209001483693; Wed, 23 Apr 2008 18:44:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.111.16 with HTTP; Wed, 23 Apr 2008 18:44:43 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 04:41:00 -0000 From: Tea To: "Thiago Jung Bauermann" Subject: Re: GDB record patch 0.1.3 for GDB-6.8 release (It make I386-Linux GDB support Reversible Debugging) Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <1208966983.5808.155.camel@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <4805A420.5060807@windriver.com> <1208446046.5808.51.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1208668151.5808.139.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1208966983.5808.155.camel@localhost.localdomain> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-04/txt/msg00545.txt.bz2 Of course not. Never mind. :) Thanks, teawater On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 12:09 AM, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote: > Hi Teawater, > > > On Mon, 2008-04-21 at 17:21 +0800, Tea wrote: > > Hi Thiago, > > > > You said: > > > +/*teawater rec begin----------------------------------------------------------*/ > > > + int (*intx80_record) (void); > > > + int (*sysenter_record) (void); > > > +/*teawater rec end------------------------------------------------------------*/ > > > > The names above are specific to the x86 architecture. tdep members > > should have a name which is meaningful accross different architectures. > > > > I want change it to: > > int (*i386_intx80_record) (void); > > int (*i386_sysenter_record) (void); > > > > Cound you please give me some advice? > > Mmm... I was wrong about that comment. x86's tdep may have (and has) > names which wouldn't be meaningful for other arches. I'm sorry about > this, hope it didn't cause you much trouble. > -- > > > []'s > Thiago Jung Bauermann > Software Engineer > IBM Linux Technology Center > >