From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10208 invoked by alias); 20 Apr 2008 02:39:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 10151 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Apr 2008 02:39:33 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (HELO py-out-1112.google.com) (64.233.166.182) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sun, 20 Apr 2008 02:39:15 +0000 Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id a73so1389708pye.33 for ; Sat, 19 Apr 2008 19:39:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.191.2 with SMTP id o2mr1194931wff.132.1208659153575; Sat, 19 Apr 2008 19:39:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.111.16 with HTTP; Sat, 19 Apr 2008 19:39:13 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 05:11:00 -0000 From: Tea To: "Michael Snyder" Subject: Re: GDB record patch 0.1.3 for GDB-6.8 release (It make I386-Linux GDB support Reversible Debugging) Cc: "Hui Zhu" , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, gdb@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <1208548428.4615.46.camel@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <4805A420.5060807@windriver.com> <1208548428.4615.46.camel@localhost.localdomain> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-04/txt/msg00415.txt.bz2 Hi Michael, I am Hui Zhu. I am at home so I use the Email of myself. Before I got your mail, I think I will never get any responses for record patch. So when I get your mail, I am so excited and so happy. Thank you very much. Now, I am beginning to modify the patch according to the mail of Thiago Jung Bauermann. Thanks, Teawater On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 3:53 AM, Michael Snyder wrote: > Teawater, > > I've just had a little try-out of your patch, and I must say > that I think it's fantastic! I only played with it a little bit, > but I loaded up gdb under gdb, did some stepping into function > calls until I was 4 or 5 functions deep, then set it into > reverse and stepped back to the beginning. > > Really, really nice work. I'm very excited. > > We will need to do some back-and-forth in order to get this in, > but I definitely think we want it. > > Michael > > >