From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id MF+MDIfmEWN6vTEAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 02 Sep 2022 07:18:31 -0400 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 3144E1E4A7; Fri, 2 Sep 2022 07:18:31 -0400 (EDT) Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; secure) header.d=sourceware.org header.i=@sourceware.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=xC+C+rwh; dkim-atps=neutral X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4EDB1E21F for ; Fri, 2 Sep 2022 07:18:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 375113857C42 for ; Fri, 2 Sep 2022 11:18:30 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 375113857C42 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1662117510; bh=s1eeTYZn8nV23buAVlVFgVwHCekmTAjdRe50QCYRSnQ=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=xC+C+rwh3Wr6Y1S7CUg9X0OoGFXvEVAshFwvM7+zrLBTniZQ3v2kNmSDzeKheB3YA wiaSLoNLT+jk/vr04I+m8MAszoRfXLDGplLnJH++77A6hzZzhkQb1FLUt4F3B8rqQU Ck7qYJvFpom3OxcBNHjcC9FY2W3UlwsYUEUkkEVg= Received: from mail-sender-0.a4lg.com (mail-sender.a4lg.com [153.120.152.154]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C1E953858C54 for ; Fri, 2 Sep 2022 11:18:09 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org C1E953858C54 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail-sender-0.a4lg.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 34C48300089; Fri, 2 Sep 2022 11:18:06 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2022 20:18:05 +0900 Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] sim: Update mailing list address Content-Language: en-US To: Simon Marchi References: <80bd8d2e1056f04bd1347a9bbcaaf1d0cd847b24.1661566296.git.research_trasio@irq.a4lg.com> <87k06pa755.fsf@tromey.com> <2a97ff52-3938-442a-fd44-6d991a21022e@simark.ca> In-Reply-To: <2a97ff52-3938-442a-fd44-6d991a21022e@simark.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Tsukasa OI via Gdb-patches Reply-To: Tsukasa OI Cc: Tom Tromey , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" On 2022/09/01 23:15, Simon Marchi wrote: > On 9/1/22 03:42, Tsukasa OI via Gdb-patches wrote: >> On 2022/08/31 4:00, Tom Tromey wrote: >>>>>>>> Tsukasa OI via Gdb-patches writes: >>> >>>> The commit bf1102165389 "* MAINTAINERS: Perform some obvious fixups." >>>> back in 2009 changed the mailing list address gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com >>>> to gdb-patches@sourceware.org. >>> >>>> This commit does the same to sim/MAINTAINERS. >>> >>> Thanks. I think this could go in under the "obvious" rule. >>> >>> Tom >>> >> >> Thanks for letting me know. >> >> But is this mean... can I just wait or do I need to resubmit as [OB >> PATCH]? (in general) >> >> Tsukasa > > Hi, > > Tom meant that the patch was OK to push, and that in his opinion you > could have pushed it directly, since it was obvious. However, you might > not have push access, is that right? > > In any case, I pushed the patch for you. > > Simon > Hello, Thanks, I understand that. Since I don't have a write access to binutils-gdb.git, I needed someone to merge my change (I just started talking about the Write After Approval access to Binutils [which I mainly contribute] so getting write access to GDB will, at minimum, take some time). I appreciate that! Thanks, Tsukasa