From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 81384 invoked by alias); 19 Jan 2017 17:05:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 79607 invoked by uid 89); 19 Jan 2017 17:05:50 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=refresh, H*f:sk:d840d9c, H*i:sk:d840d9c, H*MI:sk:d840d9c X-HELO: relay1.mentorg.com Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 Jan 2017 17:05:40 +0000 Received: from svr-orw-mbx-03.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.90.203]) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1cUG9b-0003Oa-63 from Luis_Gustavo@mentor.com ; Thu, 19 Jan 2017 09:05:39 -0800 Received: from [172.30.10.194] (147.34.91.1) by svr-orw-mbx-03.mgc.mentorg.com (147.34.90.203) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Thu, 19 Jan 2017 09:05:35 -0800 Reply-To: Luis Machado Subject: Re: [PATCH] Handle loading improper core files gracefully in the mips backend. References: <1452277948-25292-1-git-send-email-lgustavo@codesourcery.com> <5693CE90.1060709@codesourcery.com> <5694F5BC.3050904@redhat.com> <5694FEB8.10406@codesourcery.com> <56950952.2030504@redhat.com> <56951F29.7070000@codesourcery.com> To: Pedro Alves , "Maciej W. Rozycki" CC: , From: Luis Machado Message-ID: Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2017 17:05:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ClientProxiedBy: svr-orw-mbx-03.mgc.mentorg.com (147.34.90.203) To svr-orw-mbx-03.mgc.mentorg.com (147.34.90.203) X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-01/txt/msg00391.txt.bz2 On 01/19/2017 10:56 AM, Pedro Alves wrote: > On 01/09/2017 07:56 PM, Luis Machado wrote: > >> Reading the thread once again, is my understanding correct that the >> first patch is more suitable now? Possibly with some cleanups? >> >> https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2016-01/msg00134.html > > I think a summary of the discussion would help. > I'll need a refresh myself. Let me gather the most useful bits in the discussion and i'll report back.