From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 69769 invoked by alias); 14 Jul 2018 21:39:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 69758 invoked by uid 89); 14 Jul 2018 21:39:53 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:555 X-HELO: simark.ca Received: from simark.ca (HELO simark.ca) (158.69.221.121) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 Jul 2018 21:39:52 +0000 Received: from [10.0.0.11] (unknown [192.222.164.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 323ED1E093; Sat, 14 Jul 2018 17:39:51 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=simark.ca; s=mail; t=1531604391; bh=Cre7KLcirERYsivZyfSZeDCZcnBMWDaU87Ae5QyWKuU=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=HnsuV0sjSLzp6MuG+4f5DqCkk2j22jKDWSe0M8w+g+X5/io85v3WEqY/2s0anPysh j6F7Dm5d5Ogk0sZXNtzOoykTwuAhhwYP/jHa0Qn1Bp8ldvL5ewV/eBrBapWJIZmWZo e1JWFAtA9cZd50YVPfBu2CV6LFhxPeKsh/jWCTTo= Subject: Re: [PATCH] gdb: Add switch to disable DWARF stack unwinders To: Andrew Burgess Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20180713134629.27011-1-andrew.burgess@embecosm.com> <20180714203510.GC2888@embecosm.com> From: Simon Marchi Message-ID: Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2018 21:39:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180714203510.GC2888@embecosm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2018-07/txt/msg00456.txt.bz2 On 2018-07-14 04:35 PM, Andrew Burgess wrote: >> I don't think this is necessary, if you leave the "show" callback to NULL, >> I think the message is clear enough: >> >> (gdb) maintenance show dwarf unwinders >> Whether the DWARF stack frame unwinders are used is on. > > I thought that was no longer the approved approach as the resulting > string is generated and not internationalised? Ah, I was not aware of that. If you got that from a trustworthy source, then I won't object :). Simon