From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 57358 invoked by alias); 3 Jun 2016 16:21:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 57299 invoked by uid 89); 3 Jun 2016 16:21:30 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 03 Jun 2016 16:21:29 +0000 Received: from int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72767B0411; Fri, 3 Jun 2016 16:21:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u53GLQPp026212; Fri, 3 Jun 2016 12:21:26 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Fix failure to detach if threads exit while detaching on linux To: Antoine Tremblay References: <1464965361-25399-1-git-send-email-antoine.tremblay@ericsson.com> <49f3eb1e-d03d-e434-a831-e40f18f7823c@redhat.com> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org From: Pedro Alves Message-ID: Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2016 16:21:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2016-06/txt/msg00063.txt.bz2 On 06/03/2016 04:58 PM, Antoine Tremblay wrote: > However, testing it it triggers the test_server_exit timeout case, I'm > guessing because eof already happened and we're waiting for nothing ? > > I'm tempted just to unset the var... but ideas are welcome.. Would be easier to try if I had access to an updated patch.. :-) Thanks, Pedro Alves