From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id 1XS3FfzB42OsRC0AWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 08 Feb 2023 10:38:36 -0500 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 488B51E15D; Wed, 8 Feb 2023 10:38:36 -0500 (EST) Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; secure) header.d=sourceware.org header.i=@sourceware.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=H45QTBJE; dkim-atps=neutral X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A6581E0D3 for ; Wed, 8 Feb 2023 10:38:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9502385840F for ; Wed, 8 Feb 2023 15:38:34 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org A9502385840F DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1675870714; bh=c1unLyiVLXYth4tMoL6RvtZXI8bY8wHmYGbsb+aOwec=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To: From; b=H45QTBJEm3KduyNGlkeRogy6w/irLCe0XduGUgqfmHZE+Smj6rJ0tDi9LwJ5UMd7u g9rCH5kpNo0je05LaMpOoWDPWjhbzQ41NSvXRhqPuGxG/Ms8Y8Xa64qJ06nezBQKpB cMzNuaJ1rN3+aNlGlu332/CUSikBdADREiHAnZS4= Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [IPv6:2001:67c:2178:6::1d]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F24623858C50 for ; Wed, 8 Feb 2023 15:38:15 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org F24623858C50 Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3BA4A1F8B4; Wed, 8 Feb 2023 15:38:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25A4613425; Wed, 8 Feb 2023 15:38:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id c4H4B+fB42OZRAAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Wed, 08 Feb 2023 15:38:15 +0000 Message-ID: Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2023 16:38:14 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.6.1 Subject: Re: [pushed] [gdb/testsuite] Use maint ignore-probes in gdb.base/longjmp.exp To: Luis Machado , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20230208124652.29570-1-tdevries@suse.de> <23f68beb-39c5-33c8-2d2d-f076192d2648@suse.de> <57277a06-0a9c-e731-beee-1f6d0e88ea6f@arm.com> Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <57277a06-0a9c-e731-beee-1f6d0e88ea6f@arm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Tom de Vries via Gdb-patches Reply-To: Tom de Vries Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" On 2/8/23 15:51, Luis Machado wrote: > On 2/8/23 14:48, Tom de Vries wrote: >> On 2/8/23 14:27, Luis Machado wrote: >>> Hi Tom, >>> >>> Is the entire test supposed to PASS? I'm seeing the following on my >>> aarch64/Ubuntu 22.04 setup: >>> >>> FAIL: gdb.base/longjmp.exp: with_probes=0: pattern 2: next over >>> call_longjmp (the program is no longer running) >>> FAIL: gdb.base/longjmp.exp: with_probes=0: pattern 2: next over >>> setjmp (the program is no longer running) >>> FAIL: gdb.base/longjmp.exp: with_probes=0: pattern 2: setup: >>> breakpoint at pattern start (got interactive prompt) >>> FAIL: gdb.base/longjmp.exp: with_probes=0: pattern 2: setup: >>> breakpoint at safety net (got interactive prompt) >>> FAIL: gdb.base/longjmp.exp: with_probes=0: pattern 2: setup: continue >>> to breakpoint at pattern start (the program exited) >>> FAIL: gdb.base/longjmp.exp: with_probes=0: pattern 3: next over >>> pattern (the program is no longer running) >>> FAIL: gdb.base/longjmp.exp: with_probes=0: pattern 3: setup: >>> breakpoint at pattern start (got interactive prompt) >>> FAIL: gdb.base/longjmp.exp: with_probes=0: pattern 3: setup: continue >>> to breakpoint at pattern start (the program is no longer running) >>> >>> Maybe something is genuinely broken for aarch64 though, or I'm >>> missing some packages/debuginfo. >> >> Hi, >> >> I just ran this test-case on openSUSE Leap 15.4 aarch64, no problems >> found. >> > > Alright. That's good to know. FWIW, I've tried this test-case also on various x86_64 distros other than the usual openSUSE Leap 15.4: ubuntu 20.04, fedora 37 and opensuse tumbleweed, again no problems found. Thanks, - Tom