From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19790 invoked by alias); 14 Jan 2019 21:05:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 18641 invoked by uid 89); 14 Jan 2019 21:05:23 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Zaretskii, zaretskii X-HELO: smtp.polymtl.ca Received: from smtp.polymtl.ca (HELO smtp.polymtl.ca) (132.207.4.11) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Jan 2019 21:05:21 +0000 Received: from simark.ca (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.polymtl.ca (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id x0EL5FW4002904 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2019 16:05:20 -0500 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 426E51E7BB; Mon, 14 Jan 2019 16:05:15 -0500 (EST) Received: from simark.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08D881E4C2; Mon, 14 Jan 2019 16:05:14 -0500 (EST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 21:05:00 -0000 From: Simon Marchi To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, palves@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix MI output for multi-location breakpoints In-Reply-To: <83o98kec4w.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20190111001516.4761-1-simon.marchi@ericsson.com> <83lg3rhb6r.fsf@gnu.org> <7cf31d37-3931-bbac-07f2-c61f57be142c@ericsson.com> <83y37qgail.fsf@gnu.org> <10a03370-3f18-a716-eaca-5da6621d1660@ericsson.com> <83r2dgefpc.fsf@gnu.org> <5158b3d6feb794fb4db69dd3ee087286@polymtl.ca> <83o98kec4w.fsf@gnu.org> Message-ID: X-Sender: simon.marchi@polymtl.ca User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.3.6 X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2019-01/txt/msg00336.txt.bz2 On 2019-01-13 11:49, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> > Which is the third place? I thought we have it only in two places. >> > The detailed table could come instead of that second place we have >> > now, not in addition to it. But let's wait with that decision until >> > we actually see the proposed change for that table. >> >> 1. In "@node Mode Options" >> 2. In "@node Interpreters" >> 3. In the hypothetical table of MI versions. > > We don't need to consider hypothetical issues. When it becomes real, > we can discuss whether it will replace what's currently in > "Interpreters" or be an addition. I have sent a patch for this: https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2019-01/msg00335.html Simon