From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id orBULuVW6mG2NwAAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 21 Jan 2022 01:47:01 -0500 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id A4D511F3B6; Fri, 21 Jan 2022 01:47:01 -0500 (EST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FAKE_REPLY_A1,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55ABA1F0BB for ; Fri, 21 Jan 2022 01:47:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCDF23858421 for ; Fri, 21 Jan 2022 06:47:00 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org BCDF23858421 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1642747620; bh=WbMb7QjGynU9gBVvTZ0kGRXSbfYYOX+lgvwlDSfBy8U=; h=Date:To:Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post: List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc:From; b=FFroM3PtymJnXjev5C1KH81wgqH/1ENMdL1MV4aUdEQ0lJg6e6ZeXHaoaOJ2tNnaO Svc9H4F7ohCvZo7RVqdMbk1A5sQ1DL+3c4EuJCtLq9VHZwXItEY3tTFCmpwspiujig 7Ivo6EWns9TdXMbZUmeucEC5ScNjr/bhTeLAkJqs= Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [209.51.188.92]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4684F3858403 for ; Fri, 21 Jan 2022 06:46:42 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 4684F3858403 Received: from [2001:470:142:3::e] (port=34736 helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nAnh3-0003l5-Fd; Fri, 21 Jan 2022 01:46:41 -0500 Received: from ip5f5a8abe.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de ([95.90.138.190]:58160 helo=[192.168.111.41]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nAnh1-0004sZ-R1; Fri, 21 Jan 2022 01:46:40 -0500 Message-ID: Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2022 07:46:34 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.5.0 Content-Language: en-US To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA/RFC] Add dump and load command to process record and replay Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Simon Sobisch via Gdb-patches Reply-To: Simon Sobisch Cc: Michael Snyder Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" This RFC was about a way to store a command file along with recording and later be able to load it and reverse-step / step through it. That idea sounds very cool and like something that I would use quite often, especially on longer debugging runs where the starting point takes a while to reach... I've stumbled over this suggested patch which was discussed and adjusted multiple times in 2009 and then seem to be loose on a documentation question. The last entry I've found to this was https://sourceware.org/legacy-ml/gdb-patches/2009-09/msg00145.html Can anyone share about the state of this patch? Would anyone like to adjust this to the current source? Thanks for any insights, Simon