From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 125660 invoked by alias); 3 Jun 2016 15:23:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 123612 invoked by uid 89); 3 Jun 2016 15:23:17 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=201606 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 03 Jun 2016 15:23:06 +0000 Received: from int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6EDE8B0418; Fri, 3 Jun 2016 15:23:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u53FN3jZ006937; Fri, 3 Jun 2016 11:23:04 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix C++ build for Cygwin To: Jon Turney , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Joel Brobecker References: <20160602141457.7608-1-jon.turney@dronecode.org.uk> <1988579a-b74b-34c5-f7ab-6bb8f6bbfdd5@dronecode.org.uk> From: Pedro Alves Message-ID: Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2016 15:23:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1988579a-b74b-34c5-f7ab-6bb8f6bbfdd5@dronecode.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2016-06/txt/msg00058.txt.bz2 On 06/03/2016 12:48 PM, Jon Turney wrote: > On 03/06/2016 12:37, Pedro Alves wrote: >> Seems like you also created a "2.24.51.20140326" tag at >> the same time? >> >> https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-cvs/2016-06/msg00012.html > > Yes. > > I guess turning on push.followTags globally wasn't such a good idea. > > It seems I cannot remove this tag, please do so. > I believe this needs to be done server-side. Joel, can you do this? Thanks, Pedro Alves