From: Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] gdb: don't pass TARGET_WNOHANG to targets that can't async (PR 26642)
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2020 11:31:03 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d23098a0-8339-bbf7-bed8-762928b21e00@polymtl.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201013152705.36523-1-simon.marchi@polymtl.ca>
Sorry, I forgot the "v2" in the title.
On 2020-10-13 11:27 a.m., Simon Marchi wrote:
> New in v2:
>
> - omit change in linux-nat.c
> - set target-async off using command-line flag in the test
> - use target local variable in target_wait
>
> --8<---
>
> Debugging with "maintenance set target-async off" on Linux has been
> broken since 5b6d1e4fa4f ("Multi-target support").
>
> The issue is easy to reproduce:
>
> $ ./gdb -q --data-directory=data-directory -nx ./test
> Reading symbols from ./test...
> (gdb) maintenance set target-async off
> (gdb) start
> Temporary breakpoint 1 at 0x1151: file test.c, line 5.
> Starting program: /home/simark/build/binutils-gdb/gdb/test
>
> ... and it hangs there.
>
> The difference between pre-5b6d1e4fa4f and 5b6d1e4fa4f is that
> fetch_inferior_event now calls target_wait with TARGET_WNOHANG for
> non-async-capable targets, whereas it didn't before.
>
> For non-async-capable targets, this is how it's expected to work when
> resuming execution:
>
> 1. we call resume
> 2. the infrun async handler is marked in prepare_to_wait, to immediately
> wake up the event loop when we get back to it
> 3. fetch_inferior_event calls the target's wait method without
> TARGET_WNOHANG, effectively blocking until the target has something
> to report
>
> However, since we call the target's wait method with TARGET_WNOHANG,
> this happens:
>
> 1. we call resume
> 2. the infrun async handler is marked in prepare_to_wait, to immediately
> wake up the event loop when we get back to it
> 3. fetch_inferior_event calls the target's wait method with
> TARGET_WNOHANG, the target has nothing to report yet
> 4. we go back to blocking on the event loop
> 5. SIGCHLD finally arrives, but the event loop is not woken up, because
> we are not in async mode. Normally, we should have been stuck in
> waitpid the SIGCHLD would have unblocked us.
>
> We end up in this situation because these two necessary conditions are
> met:
>
> 1. GDB uses the TARGET_WNOHANG option with a target that can't do async.
> I don't think this makes sense. I mean, it's technically possible,
> the doc for TARGET_WNOHANG is:
>
> /* Return immediately if there's no event already queued. If this
> options is not requested, target_wait blocks waiting for an
> event. */
> TARGET_WNOHANG = 1,
>
> ... which isn't in itself necessarily incompatible with synchronous
> targets. It could be possible for a target to support non-blocking
> polls, while not having a way to asynchronously wake up the event
> loop, which is also necessary to support async. But as of today,
> we don't expect GDB and sync targets to work this way.
>
> 2. The linux-nat target, even in the mode where it emulates a
> synchronous target (with "maintenance set target-async off") respects
> TARGET_WNOHANG. Other non-async targets, such as windows_nat_target,
> simply don't check / support TARGET_WNOHANG, so their wait method is
> always blocking.
>
> Fix the first issue by avoiding using TARGET_WNOHANG on non-async
> targets, in do_target_wait_1. Add an assert in target_wait to verify it
> doesn't happen.
>
> The new test gdb.base/maint-target-async-off.exp is a simple test that
> just tries running to main and then to the end of the program, with
> "maintenance set target-async off".
>
> gdb/ChangeLog:
>
> PR gdb/26642
> * infrun.c (do_target_wait_1): Clear TARGET_WNOHANG if the
> target can't do async.
> * target.c (target_wait): Assert that we don't pass
> TARGET_WNOHANG to a target that can't async.
>
> gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
> PR gdb/26642
> * gdb.base/maint-target-async-off.c: New test.
> * gdb.base/maint-target-async-off.exp: New test.
>
> Change-Id: I69ad3a14598863d21338a8c4e78700a58ce7ad86
> ---
> gdb/infrun.c | 5 +++
> gdb/target.c | 7 +++-
> .../gdb.base/maint-target-async-off.c | 22 ++++++++++
> .../gdb.base/maint-target-async-off.exp | 41 +++++++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> create mode 100644 gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/maint-target-async-off.c
> create mode 100644 gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/maint-target-async-off.exp
>
> diff --git a/gdb/infrun.c b/gdb/infrun.c
> index d552fb3adb26..8ae39a2877b3 100644
> --- a/gdb/infrun.c
> +++ b/gdb/infrun.c
> @@ -3533,6 +3533,11 @@ do_target_wait_1 (inferior *inf, ptid_t ptid,
>
> /* But if we don't find one, we'll have to wait. */
>
> + /* We can't ask a non-async target to do a non-blocking wait, so this will be
> + a blocking wait. */
> + if (!target_can_async_p ())
> + options &= ~TARGET_WNOHANG;
> +
> if (deprecated_target_wait_hook)
> event_ptid = deprecated_target_wait_hook (ptid, status, options);
> else
> diff --git a/gdb/target.c b/gdb/target.c
> index 531858a3333f..a111ea3c3336 100644
> --- a/gdb/target.c
> +++ b/gdb/target.c
> @@ -1992,7 +1992,12 @@ ptid_t
> target_wait (ptid_t ptid, struct target_waitstatus *status,
> target_wait_flags options)
> {
> - return current_top_target ()->wait (ptid, status, options);
> + target_ops *target = current_top_target ();
> +
> + if (!target->can_async_p ())
> + gdb_assert ((options & TARGET_WNOHANG) == 0);
> +
> + return target->wait (ptid, status, options);
> }
>
> /* See target.h. */
> diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/maint-target-async-off.c b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/maint-target-async-off.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..9d7b2f1a4c28
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/maint-target-async-off.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
> +/* This testcase is part of GDB, the GNU debugger.
> +
> + Copyright 2020 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> +
> + This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
> + the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or
> + (at your option) any later version.
> +
> + This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> + but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> + MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
> + GNU General Public License for more details.
> +
> + You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
> + along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. */
> +
> +int
> +main (void)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/maint-target-async-off.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/maint-target-async-off.exp
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..dc205f533c53
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/maint-target-async-off.exp
> @@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
> +# Copyright 2020 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> +
> +# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> +# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
> +# the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or
> +# (at your option) any later version.
> +#
> +# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> +# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> +# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
> +# GNU General Public License for more details.
> +#
> +# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
> +# along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
> +
> +# Verify that debugging with "maintenance target-async off" works somewhat. At
> +# least running to main and to the end of the program.
> +
> +standard_testfile
> +
> +save_vars { GDBFLAGS } {
> + # Enable target-async off this way, because with board
> + # native-extended-gdbserver, the remote target is already open when
> + # returning from prepare_for_testing, and that would be too late to toggle
> + # it.
> + append GDBFLAGS { -ex "maintenance set target-async off" }
> +
> + if { [prepare_for_testing "failed to prepare" ${testfile} ${srcfile}] } {
> + return
> + }
> +
> + # Make sure our command-line flag worked.
> + gdb_test "maintenance show target-async" "Controlling the inferior in asynchronous mode is off\\."
> +
> + if { ![runto_main] } {
> + fail "can't run to main"
> + return
> + }
> +
> + gdb_continue_to_end
> +}
> --
> 2.28.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-13 15:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-01 2:56 [PATCH] " Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2020-10-12 14:48 ` Pedro Alves
2020-10-13 15:06 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2020-10-13 15:21 ` Pedro Alves
2020-10-13 15:27 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2020-10-13 15:31 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches [this message]
2020-10-13 15:44 ` [PATCH v2] " Pedro Alves
2020-10-13 16:00 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d23098a0-8339-bbf7-bed8-762928b21e00@polymtl.ca \
--to=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=simon.marchi@polymtl.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox