From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id VwvSEOhlBmLmWgAAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2022 08:34:32 -0500 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 33E2A1F3C8; Fri, 11 Feb 2022 08:34:32 -0500 (EST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,RDNS_DYNAMIC, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (ip-8-43-85-97.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AFC3D1EDF0 for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2022 08:34:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F16943858435 for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2022 13:34:30 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org F16943858435 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1644586471; bh=sEReCqC1clU4XhJvG6vxgKxe0E8rCLwDBJODWmzNBMc=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To: From; b=dK7Zt1zg+NETitFxGmS7TAIsf+6d+0JiVA5k/9EhATpYOuHEgbTa5P9a98vnFUZL2 i6GIuGDID+yEslHe29KsrWz9dwf7pAycJKL2A6CIuYwAK9EyFigtxhZPn/Rhsjtpa0 rL2tE/XAcqGf2JZm4gGCsOPNQjN7lvFgAE5PDYUc= Received: from smtp.polymtl.ca (smtp.polymtl.ca [132.207.4.11]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9969B3858D1E for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2022 13:34:12 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 9969B3858D1E Received: from simark.ca (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.polymtl.ca (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 21BDY6E9009043 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 11 Feb 2022 08:34:11 -0500 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp.polymtl.ca 21BDY6E9009043 Received: from [10.0.0.11] (192-222-157-6.qc.cable.ebox.net [192.222.157.6]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 55E0C1EDF0; Fri, 11 Feb 2022 08:34:06 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2022 08:34:06 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.5.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add initializers to bound_minimal_symbol Content-Language: en-US To: Tom Tromey , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20220208204245.2186900-1-tromey@adacore.com> In-Reply-To: <20220208204245.2186900-1-tromey@adacore.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Poly-FromMTA: (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) at Fri, 11 Feb 2022 13:34:06 +0000 X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches Reply-To: Simon Marchi Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" On 2022-02-08 15:42, Tom Tromey via Gdb-patches wrote: > This adds initializers to bound_minimal_symbol, allowing for the > removal of some calls to memset. I was trying to see if it would be better to have a constructor (with two arguments instead), so that we would never have an uninitialized bound_minimal_symbol. But there are cases where we really want to initialize it as "empty" and then check for emptiness later, so your change makes sense. Simon