From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 69443 invoked by alias); 28 Apr 2017 14:40:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 69071 invoked by uid 89); 28 Apr 2017 14:40:10 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:288 X-HELO: mail-wr0-f171.google.com Received: from mail-wr0-f171.google.com (HELO mail-wr0-f171.google.com) (209.85.128.171) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 14:40:09 +0000 Received: by mail-wr0-f171.google.com with SMTP id z52so34913670wrc.2 for ; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 07:40:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Q16v9IUgOIMqB0kht0kKD50nQbJ2g3WQObxQdw7z7p8=; b=qxnc06V0M3JFbXIYtx81SDgi8GQOlOeEdN3vs3LE2vM6yLfwNEC6uKvEXIZeK6AEWu bt8eSHNHwv8CFNJJfczDIQPUDzSAB2zy+FIfRFTGO81vJQuSEcvs8zkeCvHHti7vRRK9 Tyoo7or90v9eyU3a7Mwng3h90/26vQLDTdnC3WiFrVtzIrmxs7OFS8XYEgz6vFWH/Pfe 1mRmUmc6g096D4DHVLxXIPqRzzfLv9WL5oELjtkIkf/oCcvd62rjzVfFowUzGaQFjQbZ vgeOmgi+76T32ASBAWRDJGAItUIfGr1k8ccDXxwX0FZE7oodLbVRlEZIvbsRN9P07Fmu HqLA== X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/4/q6hsJ2ZsiclDCJqnUw+SC598i4bIwzjUnoT8bvex/5Pt0eEX xvFNfqyTRR/E50x8I+55aw== X-Received: by 10.223.175.209 with SMTP id y17mr3206162wrd.77.1493390409391; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 07:40:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2a02:c7f:ae15:7800:4685:ff:fe66:9f4? ([2a02:c7f:ae15:7800:4685:ff:fe66:9f4]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t85sm7849444wmt.23.2017.04.28.07.40.07 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 28 Apr 2017 07:40:08 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [RFA 02/10] Change backtrace_command_1 calling to use flags To: Tom Tromey , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20170425194113.17862-1-tom@tromey.com> <20170425194113.17862-3-tom@tromey.com> From: Phil Muldoon Message-ID: Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2017 14:40:00 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170425194113.17862-3-tom@tromey.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-04/txt/msg00779.txt.bz2 On 25/04/17 20:41, Tom Tromey wrote: > The next patch will add more flags to backtrace_command_1; and rather > than add another boolean argument, this patch changes it to accept a > flags value. Patch LGTM. Cheers, Phil