Re: [PATCHv3 0/2] Handle Errors While Preparing For Inferior Call

Pedro Alves
2018-12-12T16:14:50Z

On 12/12/2018 03:16 PM, Andrew Burgess wrote:
> This revision doesn't change much over v2, except that I have dropped
> the previous patch #2 in response to Pedro's feedback.
>
> I still think that patch #1 is worth while, it _is_ possible to throw
> errors while reading registers, and ideally this wouldn't cause an
> assertion (which with patch #1 it no longer will).
>
> What is now patch #2, but was previously #3 is just a small cleanup of
> test results.

Sorry for the delay, I did not intend to block this. I've reviewed
the patches now.

Thanks,
Pedro Alves