From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id PJbWAO02ZGF9KwAAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 09:06:53 -0400 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id E41571F0B9; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 09:06:52 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,RDNS_DYNAMIC, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (ip-8-43-85-97.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF74D1ECEB for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 09:06:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06FC53857C4F for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 13:06:50 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 06FC53857C4F DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1633957610; bh=/uPR4HVhk1bJVZMKQOSkXJrinmEvUnET36pxVo5iwpQ=; h=Subject:To:References:Date:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=SqWEuAwnZhnIRnqMqo1ZcNhr1/Kp7qZGcs+5FoLUxSGiFaS1f7c0s0PEt54J0tVOn tXZS8NUBvYcKM6WaoEhdD8UxH2/gPmjyCXiMV81IzHlTaDB52c6PapjZcuggP997xg COoXKSbzAUThcQ7zagPcfI4Co+bDWV1eH5PoYxzA= Received: from mail-ua1-x934.google.com (mail-ua1-x934.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::934]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67F5D385800C for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 13:06:25 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 67F5D385800C Received: by mail-ua1-x934.google.com with SMTP id u5so12602947uao.13 for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 06:06:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=/uPR4HVhk1bJVZMKQOSkXJrinmEvUnET36pxVo5iwpQ=; b=yD1h43tAniYIU+WqNxc5yeZRTIG6xFLe7VmPvcx+Pfwo/dYF3fLWZXTH7G9dyk37SW LdaFfeXOqTz9jvYPI+ZuROqdrBsPUmOAZeM8bbOzgdkvfN2aphOna+HVeoGX97DpVVNL ty8inGciBWJ2qXs3mWIeg4sfqsDmW53ZWKH/zgJiHSxHnb64T4oTcYaZPIOa7Sid6nb+ vn0ey1uxJRC3MjPToIVkeSuQ1fYkFjOmPblfIXIM/DnKu5EkwmbnM3kI89sW6uFbVRnv 1Ftv3U1rgPFPB8rPU6aoMFdP7ABsodnOeEYD/3v2Iix94tMn9FNqMWgJiS+5L/wx5O9c PtDg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530XXV04+GXg9VEU0+twdjRN22AWczz1zMDK7pm5NAWJSPPMeUY2 XLsFqO+T7FKK/av8THampz6LNg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyFfqknjgj7YUfuxEOLYvYICT5fwKHKUD672uaz1wrgrHAL5I5rgAYDhCtmGMgN5MyrHxq4kQ== X-Received: by 2002:a67:fc8b:: with SMTP id x11mr8053119vsp.12.1633957584974; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 06:06:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2804:7f0:4841:3c03:86d:b841:6b03:5dae? ([2804:7f0:4841:3c03:86d:b841:6b03:5dae]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m11sm1992482vkp.46.2021.10.11.06.06.23 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 11 Oct 2021 06:06:24 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] [ARM] Refactor pseudo register numbering To: Alan Hayward References: <20211005144521.1965198-1-luis.machado@linaro.org> <20211005144521.1965198-4-luis.machado@linaro.org> Message-ID: Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2021 10:06:21 -0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Luis Machado via Gdb-patches Reply-To: Luis Machado Cc: Peter Maydell , nd , "gdb-patches\\@sourceware.org" Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" On 10/8/21 1:04 PM, Alan Hayward wrote: > This is similar to AArch64 target, so mostly Lgtm... > >> On 5 Oct 2021, at 15:45, Luis Machado wrote: >> >> The pseudo register handling for ARM uses some hardcoded constants to >> determine types and names. In preparation to the upcoming MVE support >> patch (that will add another pseudo register), this patch refactors and >> reorganizes things in order to simplify handling of future pseudo registers. >> >> We keep track of the first pseudo register number in a group and the number of >> pseudo registers in that group. >> >> Right now we only have the S and Q pseudo registers. > > Renaming NEON to Q makes sense. > > Why not rename VFP to S? Yeah, might as well, since it makes more sense. I'll do it before pushing. Thanks.