From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
To: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca>,
Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@redhat.com>
Cc: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@ericsson.com>,
GDB Patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix thinko on common/offset-type.h (compare 'lhs' against 'rhs')
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2018 20:14:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cc884754-d607-5bf3-01c5-b3a9f65f2c7b@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e02b06f6-89a5-47c5-d5ee-163b93a015ea@redhat.com>
On 10/29/2018 08:10 PM, Pedro Alves wrote:
> On 10/26/2018 07:23 PM, Simon Marchi wrote:
>> On 2018-10-26 12:29, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
>>>> Therefore, I think we could just remove the relational operator definitions
>>>> entirely.
>>> OK, I'll go with that, then. I'll submit a patch for that soon (have
>>> some errands to run right now).
>> We just need confirmation from Pedro that this is ok and we're not missing anything important here.
> I don't recall why I added that. Probably just assumed blindly
> that it was needed.
>
> I think the functions aren't called because they are templates, and
> thus the built-in (non-template) versions take preference. If you
precedence
> make them non-templates, then they should be called. But, the
> built-ins are fine, so yeah, we can just remove the
> custom definitions.
--
Thanks,
Pedro Alves
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-29 20:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-25 21:10 Sergio Durigan Junior
2018-10-26 4:03 ` Kevin Buettner
2018-10-26 16:30 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2018-10-26 16:08 ` Simon Marchi
2018-10-26 16:29 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2018-10-26 18:23 ` Simon Marchi
2018-10-29 20:11 ` Pedro Alves
2018-10-29 20:14 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2018-10-29 21:14 ` [PATCH] Remove relational operators from common/offset-type.h Sergio Durigan Junior
[not found] ` <692dbc7e4c7e6f1f6ceccf9fb5711880@polymtl.ca>
2018-10-30 3:49 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cc884754-d607-5bf3-01c5-b3a9f65f2c7b@redhat.com \
--to=palves@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=sergiodj@redhat.com \
--cc=simon.marchi@ericsson.com \
--cc=simon.marchi@polymtl.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox