From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 57767 invoked by alias); 2 May 2016 19:41:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 57728 invoked by uid 89); 2 May 2016 19:41:29 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:779 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 02 May 2016 19:41:18 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C360D7F6A6; Mon, 2 May 2016 19:41:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u42JfGtS015673; Mon, 2 May 2016 15:41:17 -0400 Subject: Re: gdb-7.11.1 re-spin update To: Joel Brobecker References: <20160425214951.GA4079@adacore.com> <571F5BF8.4090205@redhat.com> <20160502154642.GA4771@adacore.com> <7290d675-bb3c-fa59-2021-7ab59657cb3f@redhat.com> <20160502193804.GB4771@adacore.com> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org From: Pedro Alves Message-ID: Date: Mon, 02 May 2016 19:41:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160502193804.GB4771@adacore.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2016-05/txt/msg00026.txt.bz2 On 05/02/2016 08:38 PM, Joel Brobecker wrote: > It looks like https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20029 > had its target milestone set to 7.11.1 by the reporter (nightstrike). That was actually me. You can tell from: Pedro Alves changed: ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ (...) Target Milestone|--- |7.11.1 > That's one of the things I'd like to catch, just to make sure things > get discussed. It should be fairly easy to fix that one, especiallyi > you posted a link to a patch pending review. But if the patch doesn't > make it, I think we can release without it, since warnings on the branch > are not fatal. Ah, indeed, I had forgotten that warnings are not fatal. Thanks, Pedro Alves