From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 54754 invoked by alias); 23 Dec 2016 16:06:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 54737 invoked by uid 89); 23 Dec 2016 16:06:07 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=january, January, tdep, 20928 X-HELO: relay1.mentorg.com Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Dec 2016 16:05:57 +0000 Received: from svr-orw-mbx-03.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.90.203]) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1cKSLz-0001rY-Hu from Luis_Gustavo@mentor.com ; Fri, 23 Dec 2016 08:05:55 -0800 Received: from [172.30.6.17] (147.34.91.1) by svr-orw-mbx-03.mgc.mentorg.com (147.34.90.203) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Fri, 23 Dec 2016 08:05:52 -0800 Reply-To: Luis Machado Subject: Re: [PATCH] Bug 20928 - Decode %ccr into individual flags in sparcv9 register output References: <27bde9c3-4f6c-e3fa-93a2-3531ea489e1d@codesourcery.com> <4c1b29e0-8040-b9c8-5c45-5a5dd6acd835@oracle.com> <8b54e424-fa3b-78c8-8e57-d5baff850178@oracle.com> To: Ivo Raisr CC: From: Luis Machado Message-ID: Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2016 16:06:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <8b54e424-fa3b-78c8-8e57-d5baff850178@oracle.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ClientProxiedBy: svr-orw-mbx-01.mgc.mentorg.com (147.34.90.201) To svr-orw-mbx-03.mgc.mentorg.com (147.34.90.203) X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg00400.txt.bz2 Sorry, i've been out on vacation. I suppose people are out until January, so you may have to wait until them for an OK. On 12/20/2016 12:35 AM, Ivo Raisr wrote: > Any news here? > Thanks, I. > > On 6.12.2016 09:26, Ivo Raisr wrote: >> >> >> On 6.12.2016 03:03, Luis Machado wrote: >>> On 12/05/2016 05:45 PM, Ivo Raisr wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> ChangeLog entry: >>>> 2016-12-05 Ivo Raisr >>>> >>>> PR tdep/20928 >>>> Decode %ccr into individual flags in sparcv9 register output. >>>> * sparc-tdep.h: Declare %ccr type. >>>> * sparc64-tdep.c: Decode %ccr. Fix %fsr decoding. >>> >>> You need to mention the new sparc64_ccr_type field and the new >>> function in the ChangeLog. Also, you need to add the function where >>> you fixed the fsr decoding. >> >> Here is the fixed ChangeLog entry (and attached new version of patch): >> >> 2016-12-05 Ivo Raisr >> >> PR tdep/20928 >> Decode %ccr into individual flags in sparcv9 register output. >> * sparc-tdep.h: Declare sparc64_ccr_type. >> * sparc64-tdep.c: Decode %ccr in a new function sparc64_ccr_type(). >> Fix %fsr decoding in sparc64_fsr_type(). >> >> >