From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 92735 invoked by alias); 18 Jan 2020 14:46:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 92720 invoked by uid 89); 18 Jan 2020 14:46:21 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-5.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,BODY_8BITS,GARBLED_BODY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.1 spammy=inconsistencies X-HELO: mail-40134.protonmail.ch Received: from mail-40134.protonmail.ch (HELO mail-40134.protonmail.ch) (185.70.40.134) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Jan 2020 14:46:18 +0000 Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2020 18:53:00 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gdcproject.org; s=protonmail; t=1579358775; bh=0UaIIHuu30hcmL7alwFDIRw8Zi6QO9UUUTOEHW5Akxo=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Reply-To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References: Feedback-ID:From; b=Z9wBm2U1lEOOHBhlCVAERjUKCvTN86YcDaC7ZPIZpHQpPtRJg4YqKrLBAVIF1/2Qs XIRI+4L5oG0pbsPK9jzn5wTqFrqcw/jmP7ZiejZwzugLhiVTe/xgktL4zxwVyqaSWE 03kfO3HXFByjmD2mq9QZDdjOVY7q/xf2ip5mROUY= To: Joel Brobecker From: Iain Buclaw Cc: Pedro Alves , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" Reply-To: Iain Buclaw Subject: Re: [PATCH] gdb: Use puts_unfiltered instead of printf_unfiltered Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20200117175601.GA7892@adacore.com> References: <20200117175601.GA7892@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2020-01/txt/msg00573.txt.bz2 =E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90 Original Me= ssage =E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90 On Friday, January 17, 2020 6:56 PM, Joel Brobecker = wrote: > Hi Iain, hi Pedro, > > Is this message the latest one on this subject? Christian helped us > identify this issue as a regression, and I am wondering whether we want > to try to fix it before the 9.1 release or whether we accept it... > > Thanks! > Hi, As I've already said, there was a follow-up that instead attempted to fix t= he filtered vs unfiltered inconsistencies that caused the bug. So rather than this one, I'd suggest looking at the other two here. https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2019-11/msg01120.html https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2019-11/msg01121.html Regards Iain.