From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 122730 invoked by alias); 15 Nov 2016 14:57:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 122635 invoked by uid 89); 15 Nov 2016 14:57:02 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 14:57:00 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9EC72A7385; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 14:56:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn03.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.3]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id uAFEuwUH000891; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 09:56:59 -0500 Subject: Re: [RFA 00/20] more use of C++ in the Python layer To: Tom Tromey References: <1478816387-27064-1-git-send-email-tom@tromey.com> <87a8d4ipc1.fsf@tromey.com> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org From: Pedro Alves Message-ID: Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 14:57:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87a8d4ipc1.fsf@tromey.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2016-11/txt/msg00366.txt.bz2 On 11/12/2016 05:24 PM, Tom Tromey wrote: >>>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves writes: > > Pedro> I sent minor comments to a few patches, but otherwise this series > Pedro> looks great to me. Thanks a lot for doing this. > > I'm not sure if I can take this as an approval or not. Yes, what I meant was that all patches that I didn't explicitly reply to are approved. Thanks, Pedro Alves