From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8219 invoked by alias); 28 Oct 2016 17:17:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 8201 invoked by uid 89); 28 Oct 2016 17:17:48 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=HTo:U*eliz X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 17:17:47 +0000 Received: from int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 151FF3F1E4; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 17:17:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u9SHHiDb003206; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 13:17:45 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] gdb/NEWS: Mention C++11 requirement References: <1477596094-3244-1-git-send-email-palves@redhat.com> <426db43e-25e2-8eb6-71f3-30e00e28b64e@redhat.com> Cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" To: Eli Zaretskii From: Pedro Alves Message-ID: Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 17:17:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <426db43e-25e2-8eb6-71f3-30e00e28b64e@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2016-10/txt/msg00817.txt.bz2 On 10/28/2016 04:08 PM, Pedro Alves wrote: > On 10/28/2016 01:07 PM, Yao Qi wrote: >> This series is good to me. > > Thanks! I've pushed it in now. I'll send a NEWS change soon. Maybe this is sufficient? >From 858a5212f0c3dee3fa369aa67d0d650a761343c2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Pedro Alves Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 18:10:35 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] gdb/NEWS: Mention C++11 requirement gdb/ChangeLog: 2016-10-28 Pedro Alves * NEWS: Adjust to mention C++11 requirement. --- gdb/NEWS | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/gdb/NEWS b/gdb/NEWS index 4a61438..5ccb74c 100644 --- a/gdb/NEWS +++ b/gdb/NEWS @@ -3,7 +3,9 @@ *** Changes since GDB 7.12 -* GDB and GDBserver now require building with a C++ compiler. +* GDB and GDBserver now require building with a C++11 compiler. + + For example, GCC 4.8 or later. It is no longer possible to build GDB or GDBserver with a C compiler. The --disable-build-with-cxx configure option has been -- 2.5.5