From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 105074 invoked by alias); 2 Jul 2018 21:26:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 104959 invoked by uid 89); 2 Jul 2018 21:26:02 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: simark.ca Received: from simark.ca (HELO simark.ca) (158.69.221.121) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Jul 2018 21:26:01 +0000 Received: from [10.0.0.11] (unknown [192.222.164.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8E1431E529; Mon, 2 Jul 2018 17:25:59 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=simark.ca; s=mail; t=1530566759; bh=rFU5C7mHJqmOdI0dB5wAt+vixbmm8Hk7MgxPdPytbmk=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=nAgFHGyu0fB/SlWvKAoaFoNx0iyeS0UuRC/QnLMZPlsEcvK2zjHtz+pYcL1EXwbZ4 XjwG3yLT79Pd3NtkSVLDOSFOQEXB6q/oFwNtIObIBK5vegywejvlwFsdyV61JH1L+b YwE2V3nODaphLXHVGBMFQhQ5k+ibK1920L4ii0TA= Subject: Re: [RFA 01/10] Remove TSOBS from gdb/Makefile.in To: Tom Tromey , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20180702201824.15005-1-tom@tromey.com> <20180702201824.15005-2-tom@tromey.com> From: Simon Marchi Message-ID: Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2018 21:26:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180702201824.15005-2-tom@tromey.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2018-07/txt/msg00035.txt.bz2 On 2018-07-02 04:18 PM, Tom Tromey wrote: > The TSOBS variable doesn't seem to serve a useful purpose in > gdb/Makefile.in, so remove it. Do you have a clue why inflow.c was treated specially? If there's no real reason, then this patch LGTM. Simon