From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 94829 invoked by alias); 10 Nov 2016 23:52:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 94798 invoked by uid 89); 10 Nov 2016 23:52:11 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=spots X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 23:52:10 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22F0E8124B; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 23:52:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn03.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.3]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id uAANq8sM023493; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 18:52:08 -0500 Subject: Re: [RFA 00/20] more use of C++ in the Python layer To: Tom Tromey , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <1478816387-27064-1-git-send-email-tom@tromey.com> From: Pedro Alves Message-ID: Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 23:52:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1478816387-27064-1-git-send-email-tom@tromey.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2016-11/txt/msg00277.txt.bz2 On 11/10/2016 10:19 PM, Tom Tromey wrote: > This patch series removes many more cleanups from the Python layer. > It mostly replaces ensure_python_env, but also fixes a few spots that > were missing in the earlier series. You may also want to take notice > of the htab_up patch, which adds a unique_ptr typedef for managing > libiberty hash tables. > > These patches require my earlier gdbpy_reference series. Looking at it now. > I've built and tested this locally. I will run it through the > buildbot as well -- long story, but I have to wait until one upstream > patch lands to reset the baseline before I can do this. I've no idea what that means, but, is that a posted patch waiting for review? I sent minor comments to a few patches, but otherwise this series looks great to me. Thanks a lot for doing this. Thanks, Pedro Alves