Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
To: Yao Qi <qiyaoltc@gmail.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] gdbarch software_single_step returns VEC (CORE_ADDR) *
Date: Mon, 02 May 2016 10:21:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c490cbf9-55cf-de5f-797c-922b1090cdb0@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <86d1p8eajb.fsf@gmail.com>

On 04/29/2016 03:48 PM, Yao Qi wrote:
> 
>> > So when setting a single-step breakpoint, we'd get the "kind"
>> > from the current mode, and when setting breakpoints from
>> > user-input, we'd get it from the symbols tables / mapping symbols.
> This means we need this to get the "kind" from the current mode,
> 
>   /* Return the breakpoint kind for this target based on the current
>      processor state (e.g. the current instruction mode on ARM) and the
>      PC.  The PCPTR is adjusted to the real memory location in case a flag
>      (e.g., the Thumb bit on ARM) is present in the PC.  */
>   int (*breakpoint_kind_from_current_state) (CORE_ADDR *pcptr);

Hmm, not sure, maybe.  From the perspective of syncing design with
gdbserver, it makes sense.  On gdbserver, I think that's only used for advancing
past a permanent breakpoint.  On gdb side, we use
gdbarch_skip_permanent_breakpoint, which I think no arch overrides currently,
so it always ends up in default_skip_permanent_breakpoint -> gdbarch_breakpoint_from_pc.
(Looks like we could eliminate gdbarch_skip_permanent_breakpoint.)
We could also say we should keep gdb's permanent breakpoint skipping's
logic of determining which breakpoint instruction to skip in sync with
bp_loc_is_permanent -> program_breakpoint_here_p -> gdbarch_breakpoint_from_pc,
though in this case looking at the current mode doesn't make sense.

> 
> and also need to pass breakpoint location to to_insert_breakpoint to get
> the type of breakpoint we are inserting, right?

I was thinking we'd have all we need in bp_target_info->placed_size,
but of course I may be missing something.

Thanks,
Pedro Alves


  reply	other threads:[~2016-05-02 10:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-23 14:10 [PATCH 0/2] " Yao Qi
2016-03-23 14:10 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Yao Qi
2016-03-23 17:25   ` Pedro Alves
2016-03-30 14:14     ` Yao Qi
2016-04-27 15:19       ` Pedro Alves
2016-04-29 14:48         ` Yao Qi
2016-05-02 10:21           ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2016-03-23 14:10 ` [PATCH 2/2] Remove gdbarch method displaced_step_hw_singlestep Yao Qi
2016-03-23 17:26   ` Pedro Alves
2016-05-09 11:05     ` Yao Qi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c490cbf9-55cf-de5f-797c-922b1090cdb0@redhat.com \
    --to=palves@redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=qiyaoltc@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox