From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 122989 invoked by alias); 5 May 2017 03:26:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 115527 invoked by uid 89); 5 May 2017 03:26:20 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-10.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,GIT_PATCH_2,GIT_PATCH_3,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=HX-PHP-Originating-Script:rcube.php X-HELO: simark.ca Received: from simark.ca (HELO simark.ca) (158.69.221.121) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 05 May 2017 03:26:19 +0000 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 33) id 116691E48B; Thu, 4 May 2017 23:26:20 -0400 (EDT) To: Kevin Buettner Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] Add target method for converting thread handle to thread_info struct pointer X-PHP-Originating-Script: 33:rcube.php MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Fri, 05 May 2017 03:26:00 -0000 From: Simon Marchi Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <20170408230651.45120811@pinnacle.lan> References: <20170408224959.67164a27@pinnacle.lan> <20170408230651.45120811@pinnacle.lan> Message-ID: X-Sender: simon.marchi@polymtl.ca User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.2.5 X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-05/txt/msg00131.txt.bz2 On 2017-04-09 02:06, Kevin Buettner wrote: > --- a/gdb/linux-thread-db.c > +++ b/gdb/linux-thread-db.c > @@ -1410,6 +1410,29 @@ thread_db_extra_thread_info (struct target_ops > *self, > return NULL; > } > > +/* Return pointer to the thread_info struct which corresponds to > + THREAD_HANDLE (having length HANDLE_LEN). */ > +static struct thread_info * > +thread_db_thread_handle_to_thread_info (struct target_ops *ops, > + const gdb_byte *thread_handle, > + int handle_len) > +{ > + struct thread_info *tp; > + thread_t handle_tid; > + > + gdb_assert (handle_len == sizeof (handle_tid)); I assume this is always true, because if you are using libthread_db, it implies that GDB is of the exact same architecture (32 bits vs 64 bits) as the inferior? Simon