From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 122838 invoked by alias); 23 Oct 2018 16:05:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 122796 invoked by uid 89); 23 Oct 2018 16:05:51 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=press X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 16:05:51 +0000 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E17F7356DA; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 16:05:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn04.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.4]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D81FF62A8D; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 16:05:48 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 11/12] [PowerPC] Reject tdescs with VSX and no FPU or Altivec To: Pedro Franco de Carvalho , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20181022223242.7858-1-pedromfc@linux.ibm.com> <20181022223242.7858-12-pedromfc@linux.ibm.com> Cc: uweigand@de.ibm.com, edjunior@gmail.com From: Pedro Alves Message-ID: Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 16:05:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20181022223242.7858-12-pedromfc@linux.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2018-10/txt/msg00510.txt.bz2 Forgot to press send on this one... :-) On 10/22/2018 11:32 PM, Pedro Franco de Carvalho wrote: > Currently rs6000_gdbarch_init will accept a tdesc with the > "org.gnu.gdb.power.vsx" feature but without the > "org.gnu.gdb.power.altivec" or "org.gnu.gdb.power.fpu". > > It isn't clear from the standard features documentation that these are > requirements. Is that something that should be fixed? Thanks, Pedro Alves