From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id qL5vH45wVGEFMAAAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2021 09:56:30 -0400 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 7F0AB1EE27; Wed, 29 Sep 2021 09:56:30 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D00511EDDB for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2021 09:56:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EFEC385802A for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2021 13:56:29 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 6EFEC385802A DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1632923789; bh=JvKXP9dKtjlpAlUk/KsArShXzMcPYOPZ70Hx+qCyB78=; h=Subject:To:References:Date:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To: From; b=ATh+/vJzy+JbiPfagoRDYIxqp51czhAa+aDO9pIy2qJBIeW32EMkNrORmZQNexTFN tOG/9lVyWxlozF1owJZ2Tu5ukLiRjAvY3geLiCHyTecucqQSEgO4MrdcI0StnTicSp U48XEIA47Qmr1PFruIwXlhtfm3AxwmeHf1I7Skz4= Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [195.135.220.28]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6686B3857C4C for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2021 13:56:01 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 6686B3857C4C Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A06A522436; Wed, 29 Sep 2021 13:56:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CA1214027; Wed, 29 Sep 2021 13:56:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id vabvIHBwVGF/YQAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Wed, 29 Sep 2021 13:56:00 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH][gdb/testsuite] Fix gdb.multi/multi-term-settings.exp To: Pedro Alves , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20210928175722.GA15861@delia> <81b6b3e3-12c4-e074-1b5d-70c7be375a11@palves.net> Message-ID: Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2021 15:56:00 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Tom de Vries via Gdb-patches Reply-To: Tom de Vries Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" On 9/29/21 1:18 PM, Pedro Alves wrote: > On 2021-09-28 11:42 p.m., Tom de Vries wrote: >> On 9/28/21 8:14 PM, Pedro Alves wrote: > >>> Hmm, think rang a bell. I had posted a patch for this a few months back: >>> >>> https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2021-June/179503.html >>> >>> The idea is the same, but my version is more complete, IMHO. >>> >>> Sorry I didn't think of splitting that one out of the series at the time, this >>> could have been fixed all this time. :-/ >>> >> >> Np. I applied the patch locally and it works for me. >> >> Anything preventing this from going in now? > > Not really. Since you have it handy, can you push it? > Done. Thanks for fixing this. - Tom