From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8821 invoked by alias); 19 Sep 2018 03:49:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 8780 invoked by uid 89); 19 Sep 2018 03:49:32 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: smtp.polymtl.ca Received: from smtp.polymtl.ca (HELO smtp.polymtl.ca) (132.207.4.11) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 19 Sep 2018 03:49:30 +0000 Received: from simark.ca (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.polymtl.ca (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id w8J3nNJl016087 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 18 Sep 2018 23:49:28 -0400 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id A86BE1E76F; Tue, 18 Sep 2018 23:49:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from simark.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 808AB1E186; Tue, 18 Sep 2018 23:49:22 -0400 (EDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2018 03:49:00 -0000 From: Simon Marchi To: Sergio Durigan Junior Cc: Tom Tromey , Simon Marchi , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Carry the gnulib getcwd backport as a patch In-Reply-To: <87woriw6lx.fsf@redhat.com> References: <20180918212124.5851-1-simon.marchi@ericsson.com> <875zz2scyg.fsf@tromey.com> <87woriqxmj.fsf@tromey.com> <064318869379b44cd0707ceb22e2673c@polymtl.ca> <87woriw6lx.fsf@redhat.com> Message-ID: X-Sender: simon.marchi@polymtl.ca User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.3.6 X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2018-09/txt/msg00669.txt.bz2 On 2018-09-18 22:42, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: > On Tuesday, September 18 2018, Simon Marchi wrote: > >> On 2018-09-18 17:55, Tom Tromey wrote: >>> Simon> Does this look good? >>> >>> Yes, thanks. >>> >>> Tom >> >> Thanks, I'll wait to see if Sergio has any comment about this before >> pushing. > > Thanks for taking care of this. I agree with the approach taken here > (as discussed on IRC), and am OK with the patch. Thanks, I pushed it. Simon