From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id pSIxNgznTWFJOwAAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 24 Sep 2021 10:56:12 -0400 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id CADC71EE25; Fri, 24 Sep 2021 10:56:12 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09F0B1EDDB for ; Fri, 24 Sep 2021 10:56:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3337E385842D for ; Fri, 24 Sep 2021 14:56:11 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 3337E385842D DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1632495371; bh=UskrZ0T0DjZ7cdq9zVfHE72uDDO2gZpaJbb8YqbTsrA=; h=Subject:To:References:Date:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To: From; b=B81XrF7nQzd0JxoitbP1n2gL+tN5HlmtoWKbTeVlWuKzR/lyOaZ7mls6jC5a3Ve6h VgNl1EyMfk8yi9rsT+xjG5AdsqZ1pIbubmmuea5CkDzoAasvU/0ZjcRsDbNb7pTtRR AmWxugwZjJAKpIazvjSIl8jixZubsW8W6e3ysNBU= Received: from smtp.polymtl.ca (smtp.polymtl.ca [132.207.4.11]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 966CE3858402 for ; Fri, 24 Sep 2021 14:55:52 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 966CE3858402 Received: from simark.ca (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.polymtl.ca (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 18OEthGd018590 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 24 Sep 2021 10:55:48 -0400 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp.polymtl.ca 18OEthGd018590 Received: from [10.0.0.11] (192-222-157-6.qc.cable.ebox.net [192.222.157.6]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 582901EDDB; Fri, 24 Sep 2021 10:55:43 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH] gdbsupport: better detection of -Wmissing-prototypes support To: Pedro Alves , Andrew Burgess , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20210924122933.2714720-1-andrew.burgess@embecosm.com> <20210924131632.GC1900093@embecosm.com> <9ea18967-7c71-60a0-f265-a39634b335df@polymtl.ca> <54b146f8-f83b-67ea-d63f-ece07e7b7657@palves.net> <4640bbdc-4b51-dab4-a730-3549a3b75807@polymtl.ca> Message-ID: Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2021 10:55:41 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Poly-FromMTA: (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) at Fri, 24 Sep 2021 14:55:43 +0000 X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches Reply-To: Simon Marchi Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" > How about skipping checking for -Wmissing-prototypes support if compiling with gcc then? The other solutions seemed a bit better to me, since they were adding less special cases and complexity, but in the end I don't really mind, as long as it works. Simon