From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22294 invoked by alias); 11 Dec 2001 21:23:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 21122 invoked from network); 11 Dec 2001 21:21:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO dc-mx08.cluster1.charter.net) (209.225.8.18) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 11 Dec 2001 21:21:59 -0000 Received: from [24.241.47.50] (HELO localhost) by dc-mx08.cluster1.charter.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.4.6) with ESMTP id 57376868; Tue, 11 Dec 2001 16:29:38 -0500 Received: from kdienes by localhost with local (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16DuLe-0001dg-00; Tue, 11 Dec 2001 16:21:58 -0500 From: Klee Dienes Reply-To: Klee Dienes To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: klee@apple.com, msnyder@cygnus.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFC] add 'save-breakpoints' command References: <7458-Tue11Dec2001190820+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 13:23:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <7458-Tue11Dec2001190820+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Civil Service) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2001-12/txt/msg00314.txt.bz2 Eli Zaretskii writes: > session continues, is that right? If so, there's no need to document > anything about that, except, perhaps, saying that the breakpoints, > when restored, will use the same input-radix as when they were > defined. I'd say that's not really necessary, since it's really just "saved breapoints will be restored correctly even if you have an odd input-radix set," which is what one would generally assume would happen.