From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id CuMyE51LVGE0LAAAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2021 07:18:53 -0400 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 2FF891EE27; Wed, 29 Sep 2021 07:18:53 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=MAILING_LIST_MULTI, NICE_REPLY_A,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 277051EE24 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2021 07:18:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2515E385800B for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2021 11:18:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail-wr1-f44.google.com (mail-wr1-f44.google.com [209.85.221.44]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E71B43858D28 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2021 11:18:38 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org E71B43858D28 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=palves.net Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Received: by mail-wr1-f44.google.com with SMTP id x20so3585835wrg.10 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2021 04:18:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:from:to:references:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=hSijtCHo5MsXUlYuniuy4A+Nzm/TePPaUhbNen5hUVc=; b=l+Yh02xqrYmx+erJ4pJS9nYGLVbhMOildYVV3vRhPr2mWISArh8kLNVQprl31gAv46 sz/If0GyiHySzHzpu7sFI44NSEhszZJao9CXOUuip0fEX2kbCcoB8p8dIlCr25Nv6Pn1 izh9FYy7sKFK8K3tVceYuTldRsFlhGjbBVHmOXq3r9mMBZ+FoHJxCQd/AqqU//LFlkhy 9JpbmLECPlBOaZvhLpThS6F2lsfyNrwBUY7+NKnjIeP7mAvLuQrBZKOaSpnJPnQSegJR yNL5HXSXDHZRQoupYyyXE+c7OlSzBNbd/AJ2zumtLbO3PjGaVta0I1JbalMOmr1gL6Nb kiZg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533Otk4I0i9liluSkThLZTXb9tucFFjlZmzvXs56dDo5gIqY/TCB iVIhjR0pO1vKik7+sk3XJsEeLWL9sxM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxOI0nCeudrQFIE32MBdhAl8V5CGI8L3sgb1C2QOjivcSnzOJflx4MUI7lJDQoNEXwSbpdA4A== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:6b03:: with SMTP id v3mr6090842wrw.226.1632914317183; Wed, 29 Sep 2021 04:18:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:8a0:f932:6a00:46bc:d03b:7b3a:2227? ([2001:8a0:f932:6a00:46bc:d03b:7b3a:2227]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r6sm1990770wrp.41.2021.09.29.04.18.35 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 29 Sep 2021 04:18:36 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH][gdb/testsuite] Fix gdb.multi/multi-term-settings.exp From: Pedro Alves To: Tom de Vries , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20210928175722.GA15861@delia> <81b6b3e3-12c4-e074-1b5d-70c7be375a11@palves.net> Message-ID: Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2021 12:18:34 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" On 2021-09-28 11:42 p.m., Tom de Vries wrote: > On 9/28/21 8:14 PM, Pedro Alves wrote: >> Hmm, think rang a bell. I had posted a patch for this a few months back: >> >> https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2021-June/179503.html >> >> The idea is the same, but my version is more complete, IMHO. >> >> Sorry I didn't think of splitting that one out of the series at the time, this >> could have been fixed all this time. :-/ >> > > Np. I applied the patch locally and it works for me. > > Anything preventing this from going in now? Not really. Since you have it handy, can you push it?