From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 34643 invoked by alias); 26 Sep 2017 11:26:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 33770 invoked by uid 89); 26 Sep 2017 11:26:32 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Sep 2017 11:26:31 +0000 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 530EADF19; Tue, 26 Sep 2017 11:26:30 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com 530EADF19 Authentication-Results: ext-mx06.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: ext-mx06.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=palves@redhat.com Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn04.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.4]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF7A366D26; Tue, 26 Sep 2017 11:26:29 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: Obsolete/remove Solaris < 10 [was: Re: Fix gdb 8.1 Solaris compilation] To: Rainer Orth References: <47bb2956-5654-0ce3-26dd-9f6b76ff6e08@redhat.com> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org From: Pedro Alves Message-ID: Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2017 11:26:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2017-09/txt/msg00789.txt.bz2 >> I mildly wonder if the adding of sol-thread.o could move >> from gdb/configure.ac to gdb/configure.nat. > > Certainly: no point hiding a static addition in configure.ac. I've also > found that the remaining code in the solaris* section there can go, too: > > * Since Solaris 10, dlopen has moved to libc and libdl.so is just a > filter on ld.so.1, so no need to check. > > * $RDYNAMIC is already handled above (and is a no-op with Solaris ld > anyway). > Great! > The attached revised patch has been tested on sparcv9-sun-solaris2.10, > sparcv9-sun-solaris2.11.4 (with > https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2017-09/msg00787.html applied so > mainline compiles on Solaris/SPARC at all), amd64-pc-solaris2.10, > amd64-pc-solaris2.11.4, and x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. > > I've also started an i386-pc-solaris2.9 build to check that it really > stops as expected. > > Testing is very weird, though: Linux/x86_64 only shows a few failures, > but Solaris is a mess: on Solaris 10, the vast majority of tests time > out (although gdb seems to work reasonably well interactively), while > many more work on Solaris 11.4 until testing runs into what seems an > infinite loop of > > FAIL: gdb.mi/mi-exec-run.exp: inferior-tty=main: mi=main: force-fail=1: run failure detected (timeout) > > Nonetheless, ok for mainline now? OK. Thanks, Pedro Alves