From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 68572 invoked by alias); 7 Mar 2017 15:06:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 68551 invoked by uid 89); 7 Mar 2017 15:06:30 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Mar 2017 15:06:29 +0000 Received: from int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99E48C05AA66; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 15:06:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn04.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.4]) by int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id v27F6QNo025618; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 10:06:28 -0500 Subject: Re: GDB 8.0 release/branching update (10 more days to branching) To: Joel Brobecker , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20170304175903.qwbqoqm35raz4dov@adacore.com> Cc: mishra.nitish.88@gmail.com, Antoine Tremblay From: Pedro Alves Message-ID: Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2017 15:06:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170304175903.qwbqoqm35raz4dov@adacore.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2017-03/txt/msg00071.txt.bz2 Hi Joel, On 03/04/2017 05:59 PM, Joel Brobecker wrote: > * gdb/21216 regression: TUI by: Eliminate make_cleanup_ui_file_delete > / make ui_file a class hierarchy > > We should be changing the subject to "missing carriage return > in TUI mode" or something like that. That's what it is about. > > Clearly a regression, clearly blocking. But the hope is that > it be relatively simple to fix (from the look of it). > Already assigned. I'm looking at this now. Thanks, Pedro Alves