From: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca>
To: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Change method of loading .py files in Python tests
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 21:13:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bec89a5e5392100077e62e2317d043f7@polymtl.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d4708a87-2319-b656-7b7c-6a7d2101fed9@redhat.com>
On 2017-01-26 11:33, Pedro Alves wrote:
> On 01/21/2017 04:52 AM, Simon Marchi wrote:
>> With my debug build of Python (--with-pydebug), many tests fails
>> because
>> of the same issue. Python scripts are loaded by the tests using this
>> pattern:
>>
>> (gdb) python exec (open ('file.py').read ())
>>
>> This causes Python to output this warning:
>>
>> __main__:1: ResourceWarning: unclosed file <_io.TextIOWrapper
>> name='file.py' mode='r' encoding='ANSI_X3.4-1968'>
>>
>> and the test to fail because of that extra output. Instead of using
>> the
>> open + read + exec trick which leaks the file and causes the warning,
>> why not just source the files?
>>
>> (gdb) source file.py
>
> Maybe historical. ISTR that "source" didn't read in python
> files automatically originally. But I may easily be misremembering.
>
>>
>> This patch changes this, and standardizes the test names of the tests
>> I
>> touched to "load python file" (some of them were empty, others were
>> overly complicated).
>
> Guess we could have:
>
> proc gdb_load_python_file { pyfile {test "load python file"} } {
> gdb_test_no_output "source $pyfile" $test
> }
>
> But what you have LGTM.
>
>> -gdb_test_no_output "python exec (open ('${remote_python_file}').read
>> ())" \
>> - "load python file for no debuginfo tests"
>> +gdb_test_no_output "source ${remote_python_file}" "load python file
>> for no debuginfo tests"
>
> Long line?
Thanks, pushed with that fixed.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-26 21:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-21 4:52 Simon Marchi
2017-01-26 16:33 ` Pedro Alves
2017-01-26 21:13 ` Simon Marchi [this message]
2017-01-27 4:33 ` Joel Brobecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bec89a5e5392100077e62e2317d043f7@polymtl.ca \
--to=simon.marchi@polymtl.ca \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=palves@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox