Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca>
To: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Change method of loading .py files in Python tests
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 21:13:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bec89a5e5392100077e62e2317d043f7@polymtl.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d4708a87-2319-b656-7b7c-6a7d2101fed9@redhat.com>

On 2017-01-26 11:33, Pedro Alves wrote:
> On 01/21/2017 04:52 AM, Simon Marchi wrote:
>> With my debug build of Python (--with-pydebug), many tests fails 
>> because
>> of the same issue.  Python scripts are loaded by the tests using this
>> pattern:
>> 
>>   (gdb) python exec (open ('file.py').read ())
>> 
>> This causes Python to output this warning:
>> 
>>   __main__:1: ResourceWarning: unclosed file <_io.TextIOWrapper 
>> name='file.py' mode='r' encoding='ANSI_X3.4-1968'>
>> 
>> and the test to fail because of that extra output.  Instead of using 
>> the
>> open + read + exec trick which leaks the file and causes the warning,
>> why not just source the files?
>> 
>>   (gdb) source file.py
> 
> Maybe historical.  ISTR that "source" didn't read in python
> files automatically originally.  But I may easily be misremembering.
> 
>> 
>> This patch changes this, and standardizes the test names of the tests 
>> I
>> touched to "load python file" (some of them were empty, others were
>> overly complicated).
> 
> Guess we could have:
> 
> proc gdb_load_python_file { pyfile {test "load python file"} } {
>   gdb_test_no_output "source $pyfile" $test
> }
> 
> But what you have LGTM.
> 
>> -gdb_test_no_output "python exec (open ('${remote_python_file}').read 
>> ())" \
>> -    "load python file for no debuginfo tests"
>> +gdb_test_no_output "source ${remote_python_file}" "load python file 
>> for no debuginfo tests"
> 
> Long line?

Thanks, pushed with that fixed.


  reply	other threads:[~2017-01-26 21:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-21  4:52 Simon Marchi
2017-01-26 16:33 ` Pedro Alves
2017-01-26 21:13   ` Simon Marchi [this message]
2017-01-27  4:33   ` Joel Brobecker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bec89a5e5392100077e62e2317d043f7@polymtl.ca \
    --to=simon.marchi@polymtl.ca \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=palves@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox