From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id gLmnAPy9vGe/WDwAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2025 13:44:12 -0500 Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=suse.de header.i=@suse.de header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=LpSPw5ey; dkim=pass header.d=suse.de header.i=@suse.de header.a=ed25519-sha256 header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=/1Ds000i; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=suse.de header.i=@suse.de header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=rt1Gg01z; dkim=neutral header.d=suse.de header.i=@suse.de header.a=ed25519-sha256 header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=xUQK/WfQ; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id F093C1E105; Mon, 24 Feb 2025 13:44:11 -0500 (EST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-13) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.4 required=5.0 tests=ARC_SIGNED,ARC_VALID,BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from server2.sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 505611E05C for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2025 13:44:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C05FF3858405 for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2025 18:44:05 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org C05FF3858405 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=suse.de header.i=@suse.de header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=LpSPw5ey; dkim=pass header.d=suse.de header.i=@suse.de header.a=ed25519-sha256 header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=/1Ds000i; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=suse.de header.i=@suse.de header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=rt1Gg01z; dkim=neutral header.d=suse.de header.i=@suse.de header.a=ed25519-sha256 header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=xUQK/WfQ Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [195.135.223.131]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC6143858C53 for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2025 18:42:57 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org EC6143858C53 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.de Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.de ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org EC6143858C53 Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=195.135.223.131 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1740422578; cv=none; b=pEBgIfepeRcgDQtoIFNNRZlF5C6+XmZ21av4rpDjU3j8OrMMi9rgxXvEJfc46APQZY1e2Oepkc5fK792LnCA5bABVtHJgixiR+hLtIHpaY/8Ux2H/vCcQOWMk3soBAb43heV4wSVfxaDIM08PFsSfw5kK23RPEKmFN6XqAAOG0w= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1740422578; c=relaxed/simple; bh=r4wL27okatuXeI2yq3BkM35AWQLBSTBVkCAEFw9uf4o=; h=DKIM-Signature:DKIM-Signature:DKIM-Signature:DKIM-Signature: Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:From; b=rLcaxEXxowmFIIg0AA4qzbjI0jz3oe+s8LmAcpBKsnOm5vL6WMuk0IMI8O9OVITcIufgnDJ5UHbctOdi/d0oA1nrkDdlY93WUu+2AHLAuYQV+AJrjMiZEQvows3JtwhAr7tS/2exdS+0tpzCdfraXC6XzGv5fmpY3rQWuxBm5TQ= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org EC6143858C53 Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (unknown [10.150.64.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F16441F441; Mon, 24 Feb 2025 18:42:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_rsa; t=1740422577; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=3+rjixCSFOpiLaBLobhypbvuSf5wqN1tAmsR+JQ3/Ag=; b=LpSPw5eyl69OmtSFf6+NT4UNnwFdtW4VOW1sarTkoZsAprJiAcgmEu74dx0lSAhVwxlpCK evDXref5i+PRpZaWSzQKipsIZQBolkLBtXsZrYP4doufz55GOQth8BU1b0+EzwXbGziDLG njjk1XHXkbcIoj8nZugU+NHT8kgobl0= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1740422577; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=3+rjixCSFOpiLaBLobhypbvuSf5wqN1tAmsR+JQ3/Ag=; b=/1Ds000if6wfs9Eu/i0YIlKAKOFRP6A3PIsL/seEcww0j/MRMD87JaN9Vl46zpLKcy88Nl Af5oiOQtfzQY6tAw== Authentication-Results: smtp-out2.suse.de; none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_rsa; t=1740422576; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=3+rjixCSFOpiLaBLobhypbvuSf5wqN1tAmsR+JQ3/Ag=; b=rt1Gg01zemun7lDNF2AzfhbpTCNsClOo3iPIRSQP4WyEGXPYCWT3q6JCt9I/ooMc9EdP0w q6UKxyDEM8YWmR77g9ePNQwuK1UwSK28NRCRGD5vD07nIXyaIX1hqCIDSZhlYNY+kgp4qK FPeRtejv0mgK4s7+nGfxF+6yf4AMv6I= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1740422576; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=3+rjixCSFOpiLaBLobhypbvuSf5wqN1tAmsR+JQ3/Ag=; b=xUQK/WfQkCgUB2Da60JspuJT2+Et2P2gLIF/L9P71P90wJIaGEBs9CgNjV2SF11o+UDuyP CO3b+rD6GMa3ZDDw== Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D668A13707; Mon, 24 Feb 2025 18:42:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id /LaHMrC9vGcHGgAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Mon, 24 Feb 2025 18:42:56 +0000 Message-ID: Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2025 19:43:19 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] [gdb/testsuite] Kill left-over process in gdb.base/add-symbol-file-attach.exp To: Tom Tromey Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20250217163619.8662-1-tdevries@suse.de> <20250217163619.8662-3-tdevries@suse.de> <87mseb5k5w.fsf@tromey.com> <91ab3691-d4a7-4909-9b2c-6d563bb1dad8@suse.de> <87eczn5icx.fsf@tromey.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Tom de Vries In-Reply-To: <87eczn5icx.fsf@tromey.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.30 / 50.00]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[99.99%]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-0.998]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.de:s=susede2_rsa,suse.de:s=susede2_ed25519]; FUZZY_BLOCKED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DBL_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[suse.de:email, suse.de:mid, imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org:helo] X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces~public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org On 2/24/25 19:05, Tom Tromey wrote: >>>>>> "Tom" == Tom de Vries writes: > >>> Should this really yield unsupported, though, and not a fail? > > Tom> AFAIU, the only thing that FAIL should be used for, is if gdb is > Tom> behaving incorrectly. In this case, gdb is not involved, this is just > Tom> expact spawning a process for gdb to attach to. > > Yeah, that makes sense. But I think it also makes sense to > differentiate between "cannot run because you don't have a C++ compiler" > and "spawn failed somehow but should not have". > > The former is an expected thing -- you didn't want to test C++ or Ada or > whatever. > > The latter is some kind of error. True. I don't think we have anything to express this currently. One could consider ERROR, but IMO that's reserved for a problem in the test suite. In this case, that may not necessarily be the case, the system may just have run out of enough memory to spawn a process. I've suggested before to use UNSUPPORTED/UNTESTED for the difference between: - gdb doesn't supported it (say gdb is compiled with --disable-tui), and - the environment doesn't support it, and you could say that this is an instance of the latter. In another case, I've suggested to use "UNSUPPORTED: : $msg" for particular kinds of unsupported, like the case where a test-case needs specific support for an architecture, like some register or dwarf register number. Thanks, - Tom