From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32738 invoked by alias); 5 Aug 2016 17:30:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 32722 invoked by uid 89); 5 Aug 2016 17:30:25 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=nowadays X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 05 Aug 2016 17:30:24 +0000 Received: from int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23855C057FAA; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 17:30:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u75HUKWx025113; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 13:30:21 -0400 Subject: Re: [RFA] PR python/13598 - add before_prompt event To: Tom Tromey References: <1463806850-11001-1-git-send-email-tom@tromey.com> <87r3allziy.fsf@tromey.com> <8737mkz325.fsf@tromey.com> Cc: Matt Rice , Yao Qi , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" From: Pedro Alves Message-ID: Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2016 17:30:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <8737mkz325.fsf@tromey.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2016-08/txt/msg00092.txt.bz2 On 08/04/2016 09:34 PM, Tom Tromey wrote: >>>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves writes: > >>> Right now my GUI uses this event to react appropriately when the user >>> types "up" or "down". > > Pedro> The TUI uses this approach too nowadays. > > Thanks for mentioning that. I think it's another argument for accepting > this patch. I do agree that an event for user-selected frame changes might be nice. However, I'm fine with the approach in this patch as well, because I'm sure that even if a frame-change event is added in the future, a before_prompt event can still find other uses. Thanks, Pedro Alves