From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 59392 invoked by alias); 9 Mar 2018 16:04:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 59381 invoked by uid 89); 9 Mar 2018 16:04:53 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx3-rdu2.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.73) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Mar 2018 16:04:51 +0000 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29FE6EBFE6; Fri, 9 Mar 2018 16:04:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn04.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.4]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BE7410AF9E7; Fri, 9 Mar 2018 16:04:48 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH PR gdb/22736] [aarch64] gdb crashes on a conditional breakpoint with cast return type To: Joel Brobecker , Alan Hayward References: <20180302033204.v2wvjmquwy3dswyk@adacore.com> <20180302151824.dg4y23pwjmm6nqjb@adacore.com> <18C9D0DE-F18B-4F88-91F3-826208369A64@arm.com> <31749295-0d7e-11ab-8e13-e25a070c6595@redhat.com> <20180309085122.v4fzh4vcii5plkkk@adacore.com> Cc: Yao Qi , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" , nd From: Pedro Alves Message-ID: Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2018 16:04:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180309085122.v4fzh4vcii5plkkk@adacore.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2018-03/txt/msg00197.txt.bz2 On 03/09/2018 08:51 AM, Joel Brobecker wrote: > Just a minor comment below (besides what you already remarked on about > updating the remaining targets). Please give Pedro some time to comment; > my reviews have not be exactly top notch, lately, and I don't want you > to do useless work because I missed something. Sorry for the constant delays the past couple weeks. I've been getting distracted by other things more than usual. Today I'm trying to finish/post the ifunc-fixing series I pointed at earlier, and hopefully that will give me enough background to understand/review this patch (I'm afraid I haven't really looked at it in any detail). Thanks, Pedro Alves