Re: Convenience functions

Tom Tromey
2008-10-23T15:17:01Z

>>>>> "Daniel" == Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org> writes:

Daniel> [Preachy interlude: splitting up patches good! posting unrelated
Daniel> patches at the bottom of threads bad! Until Tom mentioned it on IRC
Daniel> this week I'd completely forgotten this patch had been posted.]

Yeah, well... I sent this as a convenience to Rob, not as a real
submission. It isn't actually useful for anything in this form.

Daniel> I looked through this patch, since I have another use for it too. It
Daniel> looks fine to me, except that of course it is missing documentation
Daniel> and test cases. For test cases we'd need a function to test with;
Daniel> perhaps Rob's?

Exactly :)

Tom