From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 58742 invoked by alias); 24 Feb 2017 17:25:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 58720 invoked by uid 89); 24 Feb 2017 17:25:02 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=H*i:sk:b501b4a, H*f:sk:b501b4a, H*MI:sk:b501b4a X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 17:25:01 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 81E45C054C4D; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 17:25:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn04.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.4]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id v1OHOxWH023990; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 12:24:59 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH, v17] Add support for setting disassembler-options in GDB for POWER, ARM and S390 To: Peter Bergner References: <3b6b8153-cfff-8fb3-2cc0-2612f3d2d710@redhat.com> <98f0a8a0-ed6d-10b6-08be-2dd86cc7af44@vnet.ibm.com> <46d6c25a-3d33-8e2a-043a-b46ae004d8b3@redhat.com> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Yao Qi , Alan Modra , Ulrich Weigand , binutils From: Pedro Alves Message-ID: Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 17:25:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2017-02/txt/msg00688.txt.bz2 On 02/24/2017 05:13 PM, Peter Bergner wrote: > if (valid_options->description != NULL) > { > ... > } > else > { > size_t i; > fprintf_filtered (file, " "); > for (i = 0; valid_options->name[i] != NULL; i++) > { > fprintf_filtered (file, "%s", valid_options->name[i]); > if (valid_options->name[i+1] != NULL) > fprintf_filtered (file, ", "); > wrap_here (" "); > } > fprintf_filtered (file, "\n"); > } > Yup, that looks fine. (with spaces around the '+' operator). Thanks, Pedro Alves