From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id qF2tBqMwcmDAWQAAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 10 Apr 2021 19:11:31 -0400 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 1969B1EE1B; Sat, 10 Apr 2021 19:11:31 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60B7A1E590 for ; Sat, 10 Apr 2021 19:11:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BB643839C41; Sat, 10 Apr 2021 23:11:30 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 1BB643839C41 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1618096290; bh=huH/G/fZWXNpQE8vlkreY8iXguJlNhf8SGluw+yE+04=; h=Subject:To:References:Date:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=NfjFUzc6CmeZcBHTyqinZYV/6/X6EDS7J8IC1MwECbm8MZdBJVtqZD0UySQy1y6Vx 8VuGxxJe19U8xIoj0qAcXO2Ynpi8jhBhEegHzs/G0j4+XXq/qwuGeRiI3ja8ZSaShZ oI778XJMVaWyQpmHDsOHLoNlWfXQ0c0j7L+0iNk0= Received: from smtp.polymtl.ca (smtp.polymtl.ca [132.207.4.11]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 00CC73839C41 for ; Sat, 10 Apr 2021 23:11:26 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 00CC73839C41 Received: from simark.ca (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.polymtl.ca (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 13ANBGle030518 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 10 Apr 2021 19:11:21 -0400 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp.polymtl.ca 13ANBGle030518 Received: from [10.0.0.11] (192-222-157-6.qc.cable.ebox.net [192.222.157.6]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F2B641E590; Sat, 10 Apr 2021 19:11:15 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: Subtle problems with "info sharedlibrary" on MS-Windows To: Eli Zaretskii , Tom Tromey References: <83czw7p4nd.fsf@gnu.org> <777379173.1335754.1615393830518@mail.yahoo.com> <83mtvbne96.fsf@gnu.org> <259022839.1083386.1615397702855@mail.yahoo.com> <83y2dwbow6.fsf@gnu.org> <83lf9vbljw.fsf@gnu.org> <87sg3ygp1d.fsf@tromey.com> <834kge57z0.fsf@gnu.org> <91c6b291-f9f3-0ee9-1ef1-31ba6bb65326@polymtl.ca> Message-ID: Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2021 19:11:15 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <91c6b291-f9f3-0ee9-1ef1-31ba6bb65326@polymtl.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Poly-FromMTA: (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) at Sat, 10 Apr 2021 23:11:16 +0000 X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches Reply-To: Simon Marchi Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" On 2021-04-10 6:56 p.m., Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches wrote: > > > On 2021-04-10 2:07 p.m., Eli Zaretskii via Gdb-patches wrote: >>> From: Tom Tromey >>> Cc: ssbssa@yahoo.de, Eli Zaretskii >>> Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2021 09:03:26 -0600 >>> >>> I suppose a patch similar to this is needed for gdbserver as well? >> >> Is the below okay? >> >> --- gdbserver/win32-low.cc~ 2021-03-25 03:47:10.000000000 +0200 >> +++ gdbserver/win32-low.cc 2021-04-10 21:05:48.677425000 +0300 >> @@ -1165,11 +1165,13 @@ load_psapi (void) >> >> #ifndef _WIN32_WCE > > I see that this patch deals with _WIN32_WCE. We removed support for > WinCE in 84b300de3666 ("gdbserver: remove support for ARM/WinCE"). It > looks like I failed to remove the WinCE-related core from win32-low.cc > (I guess I didn't know about the _WIN32_WCE macro then). Would you mind > if we first removed that unncecessary code first? That would make your > patch simpler. > > Simon I sent a patch doing that here: https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2021-April/177658.html Simon