From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 07BFB386F47D for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2020 23:58:46 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 07BFB386F47D Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=simark.ca Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=simark@simark.ca Received: from [10.0.0.11] (173-246-6-90.qc.cable.ebox.net [173.246.6.90]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A518B1E8D0; Sat, 19 Sep 2020 19:58:45 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: GDB 10.1 release -- 2020-09-18 Update To: Joel Brobecker Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20200918234602.GA4674@adacore.com> <20200919194215.GA5376@adacore.com> From: Simon Marchi Message-ID: Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2020 19:58:45 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200919194215.GA5376@adacore.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: fr Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2020 23:58:47 -0000 On 2020-09-19 3:42 p.m., Joel Brobecker wrote: >>> A quick update on the release status since the 10.0.90 pre-release >>> was published last Saturday... >>> >>> So far, we don't have anything really worrisome that could significantly >>> delay the release. I'll try to find some time to test the gnulib patches >>> that Eli pointed out next week. >> >> Huh, the patch to skip the endbr32 instruction in prologues kind of fell >> through the cracks until today. It was just merged to master. Should >> we consider it for the release branch? If you don't have it and your >> compiler inserts these instructions, it kind of screws up the debugging >> experience, since the function prologues are never properly skipped. In >> my experience, this results in GDB showing wrong argument values when >> reaching a function breakpoint, for example. >> >> The patch in question is: >> >> https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commit;h=14f9473ca225290680c8b21240cdca49f8d3b332 > > Sure. This patch does look safe to backport, so OK with me. > > Thanks for pointing this patch out for the release, Simon. Done, thanks. Simon