From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id vd0eCCVlkmjErgQAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 05 Aug 2025 16:10:13 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=simark.ca; s=mail; t=1754424613; bh=KDq+cj6ul069iuRjXrKlcuWqc8km21DMrcT6KRlWrrs=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From; b=bO3Rry2FX952mwH3DcSJEModT693axNBKzTbh/hDXP2zCLJQrEEQPhA3Ec50QYhBq bF/kAdiNyh6ZHJ3it/kXmbNCGlyVtkdJhHqoZabuSfREWsg9m4+QsUpazXBldf0x8A exuU3a+UnQ3rGkxl3naC0Kr0PHNgVuDKQBSljqBo= Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 157AB1E100; Tue, 5 Aug 2025 16:10:13 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1 (2024-03-25) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.1 required=5.0 tests=ARC_SIGNED,ARC_VALID,BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=4.0.1 Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=simark.ca header.i=@simark.ca header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mail header.b=DncHvuN1; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=simark.ca header.i=@simark.ca header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mail header.b=Qq2irzOD; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from server2.sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91B011E091 for ; Tue, 5 Aug 2025 16:10:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 354B43858C41 for ; Tue, 5 Aug 2025 20:10:12 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 354B43858C41 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=simark.ca header.i=@simark.ca header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mail header.b=DncHvuN1; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=simark.ca header.i=@simark.ca header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mail header.b=Qq2irzOD Received: from simark.ca (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB7E93858413 for ; Tue, 5 Aug 2025 19:36:39 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org BB7E93858413 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=simark.ca Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=simark.ca ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org BB7E93858413 Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=158.69.221.121 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1754422599; cv=none; b=jODZ7xFkf6wQKGdAvmH5ZNMw5VAarmXpnzNw8lGM8JAqlEyROIAbXianMu6YJY5Ytv1U7T/Raj6EgU+IDfCxLjvc7TRaaBHX8qZCAzledDctKe5LCwtqeSsGkZwEM1uiQJViL/NfK5OkyvczHXPdcpdufdWqN0nVLh7iwyaI/Vg= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1754422599; c=relaxed/simple; bh=KDq+cj6ul069iuRjXrKlcuWqc8km21DMrcT6KRlWrrs=; h=DKIM-Signature:DKIM-Signature:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version: Subject:To:From; b=mJK0UaTtGB8M2UTY2UPn6kjrMrl9vHJgHsP4D5cdFONSgxkf6zptqm5ju7eFzGs3RCGUTGChZsxdY9g/19RJCZ9bewPzvJ6HPJE7TloF4/7QAl9gPgcJT4hEPPmS5wpL1iSmaQ5xY0ovyUZzorkbEaGefWxNoS98dlyi8g5QkbU= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org BB7E93858413 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=simark.ca; s=mail; t=1754422599; bh=KDq+cj6ul069iuRjXrKlcuWqc8km21DMrcT6KRlWrrs=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=DncHvuN1haK+9303vhCTFYwDTtgHYrt2kvYZCno5X8wN9GANl06UCZc/iKZiOsCOV oEjwCtml8kjVXgXLccs+b2D2alt5u7bDZKIXIed3zyEGDNzKc8RPFEK5d6nUgF/AII s06c7Rn8LfDOgYezDy/naZhX+qWzdZlUKr5hSSwM= Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 6E4B51E11C; Tue, 5 Aug 2025 15:36:39 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=simark.ca; s=mail; t=1754422598; bh=KDq+cj6ul069iuRjXrKlcuWqc8km21DMrcT6KRlWrrs=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=Qq2irzODgHn2QPiIvIrcR9gezV/Io589qHECxmu3bQ7v131NNVpZqb/1fJsvvJBpv kUPuhEvMhILS0TjElEg01lyu8y1jNCg7TNXgDH1YtAKRKRnFp9sA3TOyvnpGPVvhYY NtopdUG8artf+BRTUP22WaMlXK97YzrWMla0lynw= Received: from [172.24.0.6] (192-222-132-26.qc.cable.ebox.net [192.222.132.26]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5F9CE1E091; Tue, 5 Aug 2025 15:36:38 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2025 15:36:37 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] gdb, configure: Add disable-formats option for configure To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: guinevere@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20250526171111.2633770-1-guinevere@redhat.com> <20250707201657.972546-2-guinevere@redhat.com> <551458c7-bcb7-4643-91e4-9e01e0792425@simark.ca> <86zfcdtwov.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Language: fr From: Simon Marchi In-Reply-To: <86zfcdtwov.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces~public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org On 8/5/25 3:06 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2025 12:03:29 -0400 >> Cc: Eli Zaretskii >> From: Simon Marchi >> >>> +AC_ARG_ENABLE(binary_file_formats, >>> + AS_HELP_STRING([--enable-binary-file-formats=FILE_FORMATS], >> >> Question mostly for Eli, should the metavar use an underscore or dash >> ("FILE-FORMATS")? > > I'd just use FORMATS and be done with that. But if we must have 2 > words, then underscore is better here. I agree that just FORMATS is good. The option name makes it clear what it is. Simon