From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21173 invoked by alias); 14 Sep 2016 19:04:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 21162 invoked by uid 89); 14 Sep 2016 19:04:22 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=our X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 19:04:12 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A26C66846; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 19:04:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u8EJ49tP007027; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 15:04:10 -0400 Subject: Re: Enabled TUI mode on MSYS2 To: Eli Zaretskii References: <1E55DA7D-4F01-49BB-99FF-5A79933415A4@crelg.com> <83d1k78an5.fsf@gnu.org> <831t0m8kio.fsf@gnu.org> <7A23984E-3296-496B-96BF-F22498AF5767@crelg.com> <83864857-13db-37c2-2561-669aa4fec59c@redhat.com> <83poo671gm.fsf@gnu.org> Cc: gdb@crelg.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org From: Pedro Alves Message-ID: Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 19:04:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <83poo671gm.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2016-09/txt/msg00125.txt.bz2 On 09/14/2016 07:58 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Cc: GDB Patches >> From: Pedro Alves >> Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 19:36:23 +0100 >> >> On 09/14/2016 07:32 PM, Giah de Barag wrote: >> >>> Pedro: Seeing that Eli is able to build and run GDB with the new >>> readline, we should be able to move forward. I am willing to help. >>> What do you need from us to move this forward? >> >> See the url I pointed at and the discussion surrounding it. >> Someone needs to investigate the issues Patrick originally >> stumbled on, and come up with some way to fix them. > > Yes. But if importing a newer Readline is not going to happen soon, I > think we should apply my patches to our copy of Readline, to avoid > these issues. FAOD, as mentioned upthread, that'd be fine with me. Thanks, Pedro Alves