From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 40828 invoked by alias); 27 Sep 2017 11:07:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 40771 invoked by uid 89); 27 Sep 2017 11:07:35 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Sep 2017 11:07:34 +0000 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8BCF87EAA0; Wed, 27 Sep 2017 11:07:33 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com 8BCF87EAA0 Authentication-Results: ext-mx04.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: ext-mx04.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=palves@redhat.com Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn04.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.4]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC3258470C; Wed, 27 Sep 2017 11:07:32 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: Remove ioctl-based procfs support on Solaris To: Rainer Orth References: <7af9e9eb-62cd-ce53-173b-a12c3d6c0bd5@redhat.com> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org From: Pedro Alves Message-ID: Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2017 11:07:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2017-09/txt/msg00822.txt.bz2 On 09/27/2017 09:43 AM, Rainer Orth wrote: > The following patch on top of the previous one should address all this, > and John's comment as well. Thanks. I have no further comments. Pedro Alves