From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 72243 invoked by alias); 17 Sep 2019 19:03:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 72123 invoked by uid 89); 17 Sep 2019 19:03:16 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-6.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=interest X-HELO: simark.ca Received: from simark.ca (HELO simark.ca) (158.69.221.121) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 19:03:13 +0000 Received: from [172.16.0.120] (192-222-181-218.qc.cable.ebox.net [192.222.181.218]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B60D61E05A; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 15:03:11 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] etc/texi2pod.pl: convert @t{} to C<> To: Tom Tromey , Carl Bordum Hansen Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <87lfumwz5h.fsf@tromey.com> From: Simon Marchi Message-ID: Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 19:03:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87lfumwz5h.fsf@tromey.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2019-09/txt/msg00326.txt.bz2 On 2019-09-17 2:33 p.m., Tom Tromey wrote: >>>>>> "Carl" == Carl Bordum Hansen writes: > > Carl> Both are intended to be stylized in a typewriter font. > > Thank you for doing this. > > This seems fine but I wonder if we should simply copy the entire script > from gcc, and move it to contrib/ as well to further parallel gcc. > Would there be a drawback to doing this? > > Carl> etc/texi2pod.pl | 2 +- > Carl> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > This needs a ChangeLog entry regardless. > > Tom Hi Tom, I don't know if you said this before of after seeing the patch I proposed here: https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2019-09/msg00305.html Ideally we'd have the exact same version as gcc. But I chose not to blindly copy the gcc version, because it causes other changes to the generated files, and I don't know if they are desirable or not. Also, there are some changes local to binutils-gdb that should be either removed if no longer useful, or ported over to gcc. In the interest of fixing the reported issue without opening a pandora's box, I opted for the smallest fix possible (which is still a small step towards syncing both versions). Simon