From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id 20mSEsUtBWN2MCwAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2022 15:43:01 -0400 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 43D6A1E4A7; Tue, 23 Aug 2022 15:43:01 -0400 (EDT) Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; secure) header.d=sourceware.org header.i=@sourceware.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=kmVvNsjL; dkim-atps=neutral X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,RDNS_DYNAMIC, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from sourceware.org (ip-8-43-85-97.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F09271E222 for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2022 15:43:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1A3A3858D37 for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2022 19:43:00 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org A1A3A3858D37 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1661283780; bh=AvEb1Nw1I2L/PZuyj9mWl9f9AOLL7jq9P/pz77k6HY8=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=kmVvNsjLNUJr3bSRbVEYkiUDlvS69Ck12sRHkrLiOen1wTO5bo5EQhOh1lt+gCpNI G4QCJA50SltWQgaH5V+ywHdQRLMkCP4RlEAwz4TITHtv0E7O48aUiWpGybXN+WEAFU pyK1i4asSV5cN7cDk2YSm/tAnLXAEzVaaSV8TXLI= Received: from simark.ca (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C7463858D32 for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2022 19:42:42 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 6C7463858D32 Received: from [10.0.0.11] (unknown [217.28.27.60]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E95261E222; Tue, 23 Aug 2022 15:42:41 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2022 15:42:41 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.12.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Remove MI version 1 Content-Language: en-US To: Tom Tromey References: <20220810214316.2591985-1-tom@tromey.com> <87ilmibvfd.fsf@tromey.com> In-Reply-To: <87ilmibvfd.fsf@tromey.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches Reply-To: Simon Marchi Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" On 2022-08-23 15:40, Tom Tromey wrote: >>>>>> "Tom" == Tom Tromey writes: > > Tom> MI version 1 is long since obsolete. This series removes it, and > Tom> removes some leftovers from MI version 0. > > Tom> Regression tested on x86-64 Fedora 34. > > While I doubt anyone is using MI 1, I wonder if we would rather > deprecate it for gdb 13 and only remove it in 14, out of an abundance of > caution. > > Tom If there is no rush in removing it, I think this is a good plan. Simon