Re: [PATCH 20/40] Eliminate block_iter_name_*

Pedro Alves
2017-07-20T17:05:51Z

On 07/17/2017 08:47 PM, Keith Seitz wrote:
> On 06/02/2017 05:22 AM, Pedro Alves wrote:
>> This patch gets rid of block_iter_name_* as being unnecessary. It's
>> the same as calling block_iter_match_*, and passing strcmp_iw as
>> comparison routine.
>
> I was curious how this situation arose. Looking at the archives, I think it safe to say that someone was playing it safe when extending the interfaces for Ada. [I certainly don't blame people for playing it safe. I do it all the time.]
>
> So, LGTM.

Thanks for checking that! I pushed it in now.

--
Pedro Alves