Re: [PATCH 20/40] Eliminate block_iter_name_*

Keith Seitz
2017-07-17T19:47:29Z

On 06/02/2017 05:22 AM, Pedro Alves wrote:
> This patch gets rid of block_iter_name_* as being unnecessary. It's
> the same as calling block_iter_match_*, and passing strcmp_iw as
> comparison routine.

I was curious how this situation arose. Looking at the archives, I think it safe to say that someone was playing it safe when extending the interfaces for Ada. [I certainly don't blame people for playing it safe. I do it all the time.]

So, LGTM.

Keith